/Vril/ - Vril

Esoteric Hitlerism

Mode: Reply
Name
Subject
Message

Max message length: 6500

Files

Max file size: 25.00 MB

Max files: 10

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

Remember to follow the rules


(12.46 MB 480x360 hitler dharma song.mp4)
Transcendental Caste -- It goes beyond India Anonymous 11/29/2019 (Fri) 02:00:25 No. 26
Though the castes as formal social institutions are long gone and disregarded (a sign of the Kali Yuga), the castes themselves as something of a more transcendent nature endure, much like dharma even though many of us have abandoned it. This hierarchy of all men is built right into cosmology itself like we see in the Rig Veda (the oldest work in any Aryan language) when the cosmic giant is sacrificed and dismembered, the Brahmins (priests) coming from the mouth as society’s voice, the Kshatriyas (the warriors) as society’s strength the arms, the Vaishyas (merchants) as the thighs, being society’s support and of course the sudras (slaves, serfs) at the bottom, on which society stands as the feet.

In the Bhagavad Gita (4.13) we see that God / Krishna created this ordering in such a way that each person is naturally disposed toward a particular category by virtue of guna (the controlling mode of nature, quality) and karma:
>According to the three modes of material nature and the work ascribed to them, the four divisions of human society were created by Me. And, although I am the creator of this system, you should know that I am yet the non-doer, being unchangeable.
https://asitis.com/4/13.html

The three gunas (14:5)
>Material nature consists of the three modes-goodness, passion and ignorance. When the living entity comes in contact with nature, he becomes conditioned by these modes.
https://asitis.com/14/5.html

Though in the Indian context it seems to have degenerated into a hereditary system eventually, outside of being merely racialized. Over two thousand years ago the good of merit was ultimately realized, and that’s how it probably originally functioned. One is not guaranteed to be of the mode of goodness (Brahmin) merely by birth. If someone is born among Brahmins and he is clouded by ignorance, he is little more than a sudra and should be treated as such:
<A man attains greatness by his merits, not simply by occupying an exalted seat. Can we call a crow an eagle simply because he sits on the top of a tall building?
http://www.krishnapath.org/Library/Chanakya_Niti-Shastra.pdf

Before someone accuses me of being a meritocratic cuck who doesn’t see race for some reason, it’s quite clear that the vast majority of blacks and non-Aryans in general are of the nature of sudras:
<Śūdra is to be controlled only. They are never given to be freedom. Just like in America. The blacks were slaves. They were under control. And since you have given them equal rights they are disturbing, most disturbing, always creating a fearful situation, uncultured and drunkards. What training they have got? They have got equal right? That is best, to keep them under control as slaves but give them sufficient food, sufficient cloth, not more than that. Then they will be satisfied.
https://prabhupadabooks.com/conversations/1977/feb?d=1

Of course, caste was once common to all of the Aryan world, if not the entire planet. Among the Aryans in particular we are aware of the "trifunctional hypothesis" which posits the existence of three castes in Indo-European society. Other Aryan philosophers such as Pythagoras and Plato came to similar conclusions with there being three divisions of the soul, with one of the three being dominant in a particular person.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trifunctional_hypothesis

This post is heavily dependent on early posts I wrote on /fascist/ if they look familiar to anyone
https://julay.world/fascist/res/385.html
>>26
Castes were simply the organic view of society, no different from National Socialism. Just like every cell in the body has it's purpose, so does every person in society. Just as cells are grouped into organs, so are people grouped into castes. It was never a method of oppression as kikes kvetch in their fake history books in an attempt to turn our arms and heads against each other, because no organ can function without the other ones. A brain is not oppressing the liver (unless plagued with degeneracy like alcoholism, which is another good metaphor), they just have different functions. If every cell in our bodies started fighting each other, we would quickly die. Well, we precisely live in such societies, where every man is against another. This is the best indicator of the iron age and the absence of Dharma. Vedas teach us that the more our societies emulate the natural order, the more successful will they be. A Jew is a disease. He is the AIDS virus destroying our natural immunity, the cancer causing the cells of our society to grow without control at the expense of overall health. A body is a race. We can think of countless other examples, where every disease of a human body would find it's socio-political, economic, religious etc. equivalent, for which Jews are solely, or mostly responsible.

As above, so below. Most people strive towards the castes and behavior that their inner center is most aligned with. I believe that shudras were a later development when there were too many muds around, and that castes became hereditary only in order to protect the race and prevent the subhumans from taking political positions. If they were openly racially-exclusive, it would awaken the tribal mentality among the dark-skinned, and our people would be outnumbered in a fight. This way, it was much easier for them to accept their position as a socio-religious, rather than racial consequence. This only bought our ancestors some time, as they got overrun and exiled in the end anyway. The original caste system was meritorcratic, just as pre-Christian European aristocracies were. Sure, those born in certain families had a slight advantage, but keeping it was a whole other story. Aristos - excellence, not nepotism. Our ancestors believed that a king is a living manifestation of a god (or one of gods) because he was supposedly the most excellent man (per natural law), and they more often than not had to prove that. Being "god given" is a Talmudic corruption that came with Christianity.
>>47
>I believe that shudras were a later development when there were too many muds around, and that castes became hereditary only in order to protect the race and prevent the subhumans from taking political positions.
I definitely agree that shudras are a later development to some extent. The Indo-European caste system is theorized to have had only three castes. The three caste system is common to most recorded ancient Aryan societies in one form or another, while the fourth appears to be an innovation. It's clear to me that they are the class of the slaves, those who were subjugated by Aryan conquerors and incorporated into a pre-existing system. This is a good testament to the flexibility of the doctrine to new situations. I have never heard anyone say before that the cause of the castes becoming hereditary was due to measures taken to protect the race though. This is an extremely interesting theory and would make a lot of sense to me. I will have to think about and study this further to clarify my thinking on it. From first glance this seems very plausible. The fatal flaw in the system was of course though that it never fully grasped the importance of race. Becoming hereditary as it did, it still allowed some inferior blood to leak into the upper castes through females marrying up to Aryan males. This is merely once source of the great downfall in the East. I agree with the rest of your post and don't have much to add, especially since I coincidentally just made a post that was similar in some respects over at >>/pol/13374
>>48
If we see the classical system as a three tiered pyramid, the slave caste is the ground beneath the pyramid.

Delete
Report/Ban

Captcha (required for reports and bans by board staff)


no cookies?