>>13925 >"soon they'll call anyone who opposes immigration a terrorist"
Is this supposed to be a bad thing? When people are labeled terrorists for thinking the obvious, they'll start opening their eyes. No matter what happens, anti immigration nibbas will eventually be labeled as terrorists anyways. This will also benefit the election chances of any anti immigration or slightly radical candidates. maybe the next leader.
I'm not sure what the correct path is, but I know for a fact they want to push Orwellian laws on us via shitty retarded hardly noticeable attacks with no symbolic or literal meaning perpetuated by some mentally ill (((spergs))). I also know they want us to do what we've been doing for the last 70 years, nothing while hoping the next leader shows up, larping up and down the streets. That's actually why they've been so obvious with the subhumans. They know the leader is near. They know millions of radical primates will, at the very least, slow us the fuck down when we gain control back over Europe.
I am Absolutley not encouraging anything violent. But I know brievik and Tarrant were huge benefits and eye openers. People could literally feel "something" watching BTs video. Dylan roof did nothing at all except make niggers hate us. Beneficial? idk. Patrick cruisius didnt do shit but help push an agenda and get laws put into place, either then or in the future, while getting mongrel mestizos to hate us when we should be siding with them, at least for now.
slightly unrelated I keep hearing that people up north, particularly New York and particularly lower classed people, are not only self segregating, but also largely woke on the JQ. would like thoughts