/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Politically Incorrect

Mode: Reply
Name
Subject
Message

Max message length: 6500

Files

Max file size: 25.00 MB

Max files: 10

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

Remember to follow the rules


How to redpill women? Anonymous 12/20/2019 (Fri) 04:38:48 No. 15797
I currently have a girlfriend and she’s genuinely an amazing woman. She’s talented hard working loves cooking, grew up in a small town and was a virgin before she met me. The only problem is that she is super blue pilled and whenever I try to explain to her why she’s wrong she just shuts down changes the subject. My concern is that if I end up marrying her she’ll either infect my kids with that bullshit or things won’t work out cause we believe in different things. Any ideas on how to bring her to our side?
>>15797
I think a major problem she has is that her parents divorced when she was fairly young and was then raised but her left wing mom and her dad is pretty weak willed and neglectful. So I think her not having strong make role models kinda messed her up a little.
>women
>strong beliefs and convictions
lol, women don’t have political beliefs. They shape their opinions to conform to the dominate power structure in their lives. If she loves you then she will become right wing, or at least suppress her left wing views, without you having to lift a finger.
>>15797
>making your relationship dependant on politics
Don't go that road, anon. Politics don't or shouldn't matter in a relationship - what matters are values. Does she value the safety of her children, her people, her race? Does she value the laws of science, e.g. xx and xy chromosomes as determining factor for gender? Are her values centred around political figures or celebrities? You have to reflect on your own ways of thinking and realize what your focus needs to be on. You cannot force a change of mind, you can assist in her finding the light but if you try to push her, the relationship could ultimately end. Be patient and careful but determined. Best of luck.
Just like children, women expect you to tell them how to behave, and what to think as right and wrong. When they're trying to have their own opinion, which differs from yours, it's a test, so that you can show to her how you deal with people with differing opinions.

What she expects from you is, that you prove, that following your lead is better for her, than not following your lead. Especially if she hasn't been sluttified yet, she'll fall in line as soon as you've proven that you deserve your leading role.

Expect, that it'll take a while until you've proven yourself to be worthy of leading, and expect constant attempts to undermine your role. All women do this. They're doing this, because they want you to prove, that you're worthy.

Oh, and btw, don't be tolerant towards what life she has. If she has friends, that don't fit into your lifestyle, you should expect her to get rid of those friends, because otherwise they'll undermine everything you'll build together, and both of you have to prove, that you're able to make hard decisions, when it comes to protecting your family. If you don't, it will break apart, so try to find out sooner rather than later, if she has what it takes.
>>15849
This.
"Redpilling women" is a typical newfag statement.
After a while your woman will automatically adopt your views.
>>15852
Values and politics are pretty much the same thing. Everything you've described has to do with politics.
actually I think is more important to redpill women than men, they are the main target of shitskins
>>15855
>being this much of a newfag
Redpilling women is completely impossible since women just follow the dominant ideology of their community.
We need to redpill to majority of White men and encourage them to take back their society. After that women will fall back in line.
>>15855
Per the other responses in this thread, the only way to "redpill" women is to marry and dominate them. The problem is, female hypergamy has gone unchecked far too long, so men either need to acquire many times more resources they need to raise a family in order to appease these inflated standards, or take measures to erase women having the ability to choose a partner in the first place since the time when that decision was robbed from her father by The Tribe pushing the (((nuclear family))) instead of the traditional multigenerational household Whites have had for millennia.
Don't worry about redpilling women, they'll conform to you. Never attempt to argue with a woman about politics.
>>15862
It's reality that redpills women.
When diversity and feminist "liberation" fucks with their lives, the ones that are not completely braindead will find a way to the redpill on their own.
Overall women are herd creatures, so if current society rewards degeneracy and being libertine of course they will follow in these lines in great numbers (there are some who don't, but they are exceptions).
Also one thing is "redpilling women" collectively, another is redpilling your woman.
In the first case, as I said, it's mainly a process the woman can only confront on her own and not be forced to (has any of you been "forced" to swallow the redpill?); in the second case well it's different.
First of all, why would you start a relationship with a woman that views the world in a complete opposite way (unless it's just a pump and dump thing)?
Usually a couple that gets along enough to start a stable relationship must have something in common, not necessarily politics but at least a broader view of the way to live life and eventually raise a family.
If you are, for example, a fascist I hardly see a stable future with a woman who is brainwashed into feminism and degeneracy.
So it's safe to assume that if you are a fascist and you find a woman that is ok with you to begin with, then it will be pretty easy to introduce her to your views and the values on which you intend to build your family.
If a woman just goes from one man to another, accepting passively whatever her current partner wants just to keep riding a cock, then she's trash and you should not waste your time trying to "redpill" her.
>>15854
>after a while
It’s predicated on her ability to be bonded to you, and don’t expect her to become right-wing in any sense of the world. Women are naturally egalitarian socialists. The best you can often hope for is to have her abdicate any real political views, to be the type of person whose politics changes based on the last person she talked too, which should be you.
Be strong, and do not bend the will when it comes to your actions. Letting her talk doesn't matter in the end as long as you are the ultimate say as the head of the house.
>>15890
>muh wimminz raits
Hello crypto-feminist
>>15887
>>15890
>muh muhsoknees
>muh choice
this isn't Plebbit, landwhale
bump against the slide raid
>>15885
>Women are naturally egalitarian
This is correct, but it is possible to shift a woman a little bit to the right. For example if her partner is a White Nationalist, the woman may become a cuckservative.

>>15887
>calls someone a kike
>uses kike language

>>15890
It's the opposite of barbaric. In (most of) the animal kingdom and in primitive societies women choose their own partners. In successful civilizations their partners are chosen for them.
>in primitive societies women choose their own partners

Isn't arranged marriage still a thing in underdeveloped societies?
>>15959
The societies are "underdeveloped" because they consist of brown people, not because of the arranged marriages.
Also nearly all these societies have
>lower suicide rates
>lower rates of drug use
>higher fertility rates
>less (sexual) degeneracy

Saying that allowing women freedom of choice is an "Aryan value" is like saying that homosexuality is an "Aryan value"
Brown countries usually don't tolerate fags, while nearly all White countries do.
>>15973
For the same (((reason))) they let women choose their own partners.

jews have pushed both homosexuality and feminism on White countries. And to claim that either of those 2 are "Aryan values" is ridiculous. And yes letting women choose their own partners IS feminism. Whenever there is a country or a culture were there are arranged marriages, the jews kvetch about it.
>>15978
This anon gets it. The apex state, the ultimate state which all subversive influences strive to make real, is when the host population accepts the subversion as an inherent part of their own unique culture. White culture in the modern era is unfortunately littered with such achievements from its subverters. Feminism is one such corrupting blemish.
(99.91 KB 1140x1118 gas_bill.jpg)
>>15969
>Saying that allowing women freedom of choice is an "Aryan value" is like saying that homosexuality is an "Aryan value"

False dychotomy.

Also, about your greentext:
-lower suicide rates correlate with lower IQ (ever seen a retard cogitate about suicide or being depressed?)
-Brown people do drugs a lot
-Higher fertility rates yes they have them but this is not necessarily a good thing (overpopulation is a problem, eugenics should be mandatory even in a country only inhabited by White people)
-less sexual degeneracy in non-westernized societies is provided by a surviving shame culture, that the kikes have promptly destroyed in the West like they always do when they get enough power into a society (we all know about Weimer Republic).

Remove the kikes and their constructs, bring back natural order into society (like fascism can do) and women will fall in line with the new order because they are herd.
>>15983
7/10 bait
>>15984
Not an argument
>>15989
1/10 bait
>>15991
Still no arguments.
>>15983
>lower suicide rates correlate with lower IQ
That may play a small part, but the biggest reason the suicide is lower in brown countries is because marriages are successful. The majority of suicides are always men and in brown countries young men have a successful marriage to look forward to, whereas in White countries they don't.
Also divorced men have higher suicide rates and in brown countries divorce isn't a thing, because of patriarchy.

>Brown people do drugs a lot
We were talking about brown countries which have arranged marriages and those countries have much lower suicide rates than White countries.

>Higher fertility rates yes they have them but this is not necessarily a good thing (overpopulation is a problem, eugenics should be mandatory even in a country only inhabited by White people)
The nationalist solution the over population is to reduce the amount of people other races, not that of your own race. Only when that isn't enough, you can reduce the amount of people of your own race.

>less sexual degeneracy in non-westernized societies is provided by a surviving shame culture, that the kikes have promptly destroyed in the West like they always do when they get enough power into a society (we all know about Weimer Republic)
I was merely illustrating that the "underdeveloped countries" are in many ways superior to ours. There also is a correlation between women having the freedom of choice and sexual degeneracy.

>Remove the kikes and their constructs
Women having the freedom to choose their partners IS one of there constructs.
Before jews had influence in western countries many women were married off, especially among religious households.
>>15983
>>15995
Also regarding the suicide rate and IQ, this is mostly a western phenomenon because high IQ men often have more difficulty with getting women. Women date the low IQ jocks and the high IQ men get depressed.
>>15998
I don't know about studies that prove a correlation between arranged marriages and lower suicide rates. Could you provide any?
I know about studies that correlate the cold climate and lack of sun light to higher suicide rates and depression. Brown countries have hot climate and lots of sunlight.
One thing is for sure: a low IQ retard could never develop depression because he lacks higher intellectual skills, so my point about brown people being "happier" because they are dumber still stands.

>>15995
>The nationalist solution the over population is to reduce the amount of people other races
I agree, but this does not invalidate the need for eugenics in general.

>"underdeveloped countries" are in many ways superior to ours
I don't agree with your wording. They are not objectively superior (brown people wouldn't keep flooding in the West if this was true), they simply still have mechanisms that allow them to reproduce uncontrollably (which, I repeat, is not a good thing per se)
>There also is a correlation between women having the freedom of choice and sexual degeneracy.
>Women having the freedom to choose their partners IS one of there constructs.
Yes, this is correct.
Shame culture has proved itself to be the best deterrent against degeneracy, it has worked for centuries and it has also been useful after that arranged marriaged were dropped among the general population, because not marrying or marrying a degenerate husband was still a huge taint upon a woman.
If society rewards degeneracy women will chose it, if not they will stay in line.
It's up to men to decide the line, westerners don goofed by kikes and current society is the result.
>>15958
>may become a cuckservative
These are the kind of changes you should be looking for. I’d say depoliticization is better than being as despicable a creature as a moderate republican. But if you want a puppy that you taught a few tricks, like parroting pragerU tier talking points (again, don’t except anything more extreme, you are fighting against female nature), then try to change her opinions using a mix of pua techniques and the same type of stuff you would use on a man. I’m just guessing on that plan, I’ve never tried to do it.
>>15998
>Women date the low IQ jocks and the high IQ men get depressed.
I hate to say this, but usually attractive people are smarter than average. At any rate, if we are all super geniuses, why don't we have our balls drop, inject some T and become greek gods ourselves.

Waa, women should love us for who we are.
>>16065

>attractive ones smarter than average

There is truth to that. Unfortunately, they tend to get lost in their increasing ego after a certain amount of regular attention by the opposite sex. Needless to say, it distorts their intelligence, reducing them to the status of a pleb.
I should know, for it happened to me during high school.
>>16065
It's not just about looks. In fact women care much less about looks (as in handsomeness), than men do.
Women are more attracted to a "bad boy" than to a studying nerd.
It's well known that women's choice in men is dysgenic whereas arranged marriages are eugenic and also make for more social stability.
(28.94 KB 342x358 charles-asburg4.jpg)
>>16090
>arranged marriages are eugenic
How?
>>16091
If a father marries off her daughter, he will pick the wealthiest, highest status man he can find. Generally speaking wealthy men are smart.
This makes it so that smart men get to breed more and that more smart children are born.

If a women chooses her partner she will pick one on the basis of looks and of "bad boy behavior". Most women will pick a jock, a Jersey Shore type, a criminal or, worst case scenario, a nigger.
If these types of men get to breed more, it obviously is dysgenic.
(296.98 KB 770x1020 20191223_183313.jpg)
>>15797
You can't "redpill" women. You just have to dominate them. Women always submit to the most dominant men.
>>16081
>it distorts their intelligence
Please explain.

>>16090
This. Women only care about being protected. In any society with a modicum of wealth, the additional resources of a smart man mean nothing; her only real threat comes from within, physical danger which is often brought about by, you guessed it, the "bad boy". So whats the bast way to be protected from the bad boy? To get fucked by him. Sure, he might mistake you for a punching bad when you do something stupid, but he won't slit your throat when he needs money for cigs. It's the optimal evolutionary strategy for women, really. To change this requires changing/suppressing female nature, but civilization is about nothing if not changing and suppressing nature.

>>16091
He said arranged marriages, not inbreeding. But I don't expect a mud-kike like you to know the difference.
>>16670
Your whore mom is a mudshit, nigger.
Arranged marriage among cousins was a thing, and still is among subhuman brown muzzies that you probably love and look upon as an example to follow. Nigger.
>>16679
Instead of using nigger twice, try more creative insults like dirtskin, griod, shitmutt, etc.
>>16670

What am I reading here a blackpill thread or a mgtow thread?
Lmao.
Youre all so wrong.
It has 0 to do with "bad boys" it has to do with some traits that bad boys display which guys that moan about women dont, simple as that.
Next up youre gonna tell me having children is bad too.
>>16679
>>16833
t.bluepilled faggots


>Next up youre gonna tell me having children is bad too.
A society which suppresses the decadent nature of women will always have more babies that the ones that don't.
(28.91 KB 540x526 brainlet 2.jpeg)
>>16679
> a certain small percentage of arranged marriages were among cousins therefore all arranged marriages are bad
(4.35 KB 211x239 1515227205043.png)
>>16841
>all arranged marriages are good

see, I can do the same
>>16833
Do you want niglets? That’s how you get niglets.

>>16845
No. It’s not funny when you have a single statement, there is no logic to mock. I mean really, does the cia even tech you jidf shills about shitposting? Or are you just sent out with a vpn and a slap on the bum?
>>16920
Stop projecting.
I bet you are a cringey White sharia lover, aren't you?
>>16845
That's not even what the post implied, retard.
>>16932
are you a brainlet?
>>16845
>>16937
>doesn't know how memes work
The first post actually pointed out what your post was implying, while your response was a complete strawman.

2 years, newfag
>>15797
OP, whenever discussing the challenges we face in society, make sure to use economics to explain the problems and the solutions to those problems to her.
Economics doesnt care about feelings or social justice, its basically mathmatics and facts.
Pnce youve conditioned your "gf" to seeimg the world through the eyes of an economist, two things will immediatley happen:
1. She'll never believe social justice to be the solution to anything.
2. She'll see the joo in every advertisement and on every corner.
Both of these things will make for a sound partner and mother to your children as she will live only to avoid being joo'd and serve only the best interest of her family.
>>16927
You’re against sharia? I bet you are some kind of woman-loving nazi.
>>17016
>mathematics and facts
>woman
Make small jokes and slowly introduce the lititger
>>17016
>economics
>mathmatics and facts

lol, worst advise you could give.
With women everything is based on emotion.
>>17091
>play their game. Be an emotional faggit and things will work out great
numales, everyone.
>>17108
To persuade people you have to keep your audience in mind. A good teacher knows this. You're not going to engage in complex terms to explain a subject to kindergartners, just like how like it is necessary to up the pathos when talking to women. I constantly appeal to emotion because it works, although personally I couldn't be taken in by those types of arguments myself.
>>17109
>You're not going to engage in complex terms to explain a subject to kindergartners
Thats wrong, though and studies have proven if you speak to children like adults, they develop reading, writting and speech much sooner than if you indulge them in babby talk.
You just have to find some aspect of economics that will capture their attention. Going forward from there it'll be easier to explain things to them because they'll be more engaged in the learning process.
>>17110
>babby talk.
Lol you didn't understand what I was trying to say at all
>>17112
>I constantly appeal to emotion
>you arent understanding me
I/O psychology was established to do exactly what youre attempting to do on a much larger scale.
Youre attempting to assess a womans passions and speak to her emotions to keep her engaged in a discussion.
I/O pscyhology looks further into the differences between individuals in an environment that lacks social cohesion so that we can work towards creating some semblence of social cohesion to keep employees engaged in work. Differences exist between departments and a diverse employee base as they do between a knoledgable man and clueless woman.
>>17112
>I constantly appeal to emotion
>you arent understanding me
I/O psychology was established to do exactly what youre attempting to do on a much larger scale.
Youre attempting to assess a womans passions and speak to her emotions to keep her engaged in a discussion.
I/O pscyhology looks further into the differences between individuals in an environment that lacks social cohesion so that we can work towards creating some semblence of social cohesion to keep employees engaged in work. Differences exist between departments and a diverse employee base as they do between a knoledgable man and clueless woman.
(28.93 KB 613x381 staring roasties.jpg)
>>17112
Lol you didn't understand what I was trying to say at all
That's what you get for using logic with a woman, after all.
don't, lead by example or "be a chad" she'll catch on. women are natural followers. That's why they can never make up their mind, it's because they usually don't have to.
It took a while to read all the posts written on red-pilling women.

And I'm terrified of what I've read so far.

Are you people aware that women compose around %51 of the society and all this crap you've been posting are pissing them off, while we need numbers who will support our cause??? Like it or not democracy rules our societies and they get to vote. So if you want support you gotta shut the fuck up.

If you speak of women as children that do not have their own will or political opinions they will never cherish right wing.

I hate to mention this but I am a woman. I was raised by a single mother, who is a leftist by the way, never been with a man to influence or change my beliefs of the world. I've come to realize what is going on in my country, what the kikes are up to and what the invaders are doing to our society. Only then I started visiting 4kike, 8chan etc and understood the problems we're facing.

Now you go and say that I have an intelligence level slightly above a toddler's and need to be told what to think, then you lose me.

I'm completely against mix racial marriages and I want to raise my own healthy aryan kids one day with the aryan husband I hope to have one day. But I don't want to be treated like shit, nor do I want to be dominated.

In the past both men and women of the Aryan race were warriors, proud people who respected their race and who respected each other. Now some scumbags whose minds are shaped by dirty Christianity beliefs think they can dominate me? I certainly don't think so. WE do not dominate but respect each other in order to procreate and save our nations.

So get over yourselves you christfaggots.
(99.62 KB 1254x261 nogirlsonthenet.png)
>>17346
>I am a woman
First of all, post proof or shut the fuck up.
There are no women on the internet, always remember that.
Secondly, nothing is eternal and in your post you imply (((democracy))) will exist forever.
It won't.
Now listen and listen carefully:
no amount of blabbering and kike subversion can stop the natural order from regaining its rightful place on top of human societies.
The moment the (((democratic))) "peaceful" parenthesis that the West has lived in the last 80 years will end, plunging us all in war once again like it's always been for centuries, all the blabbering of votes and appealing to muh optics for women will melt like snow in the sun.
When shit will hit the fan, all women will have to come to terms to the fact that they ARE weak, that they NEED men to protect them, and that that bullshit that kikes sold them these last decades were all just a bunch of pink colored subversion to take down an entire civilization.
The sooner you get it into your skull, the better.
>>17346
>So get over yourselves you christfaggots
Imagine thinking you have to be a Christfag to think that women shouldn’t participate in politics or have equality with men. We will not pander to the Plebeian mob to get popularity.

Your emotional childlike female nature is very evidence in this post, missy
>>17350
>First of all, post proof or shut the fuck up.
There are women on the internet so just gonna ignore that.
>Secondly, nothing is eternal and in your post you imply (((democracy))) will exist forever.
I don’t think it should last forever.
>the natural order from regaining its rightful place
I think you completely misunderstood the way natural order works. Do your readings.
>all women will have to come to terms to the fact that they ARE weak
Only the incels lacking self-esteem claim that women are weak. Women are an essential part of a healthy society, they raise the kids and shape their world views while lazy ass fathers scratch their bellies and fart thinking they have the power to change the world. That’s how my christfag dad turned my mom into a commie, trying to “dominate her”. And if he was given the chance to decide who I would marry like you say, he would’ve given me away to another christfag like himself to turn me into a commie like my mother.
Besides if women are the weak ones, how are there so many boards on how to become an alpha, eat healthy, work-out find a decent woman to marry and shit, one who is already strong do not strive to become strong. I guess those intellectually sophisticated, fit-to-rule men are not that strong after all.
>>17351
>Imagine thinking you have to be a Christfag to think that women shouldn’t participate in politics
To my experience so far, they are all christfag losers.
>Your emotional childlike female nature is very evidence in this post, missy
Oh I am not emotional at all dear. Just enthusiastic.
>>17353
>Only the incels
Jumping straight to "muh wet holes", eh?
>>17354
I’m just trying to make a point here. You’re all complaining about how invaders ruin our countries, how sneaky jews try to take over the world and destroy the White nations while all you people are doing is to piss of a population that compose the half of the White nations. White women are White and you contradict yourselves by insulting and degrading White people. If there will ever be a race war, White women must take their part in it and you’re completely ignoring the fact that women are capable of loving their nations and countries.
>>17357
>White people / Aryans that there is inequality and hierarchy
Totally agree with you here.
>they are not equal with men
I don’t believe men and women are equal either. But that doesn’t mean they are superior to one another to the point of insulting, degrading or physically damaging. They have their own roles in the society and they should play their parts by respecting each other. I’m just saying those dim-witted idiots above insulting women are damaging the cause and turning more and more women into commies.
As for political engagement, I do not agree with you. You cannot ignore half of the population and tell them to suck it up. I think women can be involved in politics as long as they do not neglect their responsibilities to the society as a woman, very much the same as men should do. I believe that's how a successful and healthy society can be constructed.
>>17346
Are you, by chance, Stella?
>>17346
>I don't want to be treated like shit, nor do I want to be dominated.
Textbook shit-test right here
>>17346
>I don't want to be treated like shit, nor do I want to be dominated.
Textbook shit-test right here
>>17346
Women are followers, they are the herd. If you haven't noticed this yet, you are a zoomer for sure. Just open your eyes, look around. It's not that we want it to be this way, it's just the way it is. I'd prefer a wife who is an equal partner. I don't have that though, I have a wife who is emotional, who must me managed.

I don't think any of our online efforts will red-pill women, that's a false goal. I am here to make better men, who will be followed by women IRL. And I am here to shitpost. Definitely.
> 17360
The last time I checked I wasn't.
>Women are followers, they are the herd.
> I'd prefer a wife who is an equal partner.
This is like saying there are faggots who are White so all Whites are faggots. Just because your wife isn't to your liking doesn't mean all women are to be followers.
The idea of hierarchy among the Whites doesn't necessarily suggest women have to be inferior. It rather points out that those who are intellectually more capable are the ones to rule and those who are not to follow the orders and do their part, that includes both men and women.
>>17346
Tits or GTFO
>>17365
well, tiddies or gtfo then
(9.62 KB 474x253 bellcurve.jpeg)
>>17367
Let me introduce you to the "bell curve". I am speaking about the average woman. Just because there are long tails on the bell curve doesn't mean that I'm not mostly correct. Also, because outliers exist doesn't mean that the odds change any.

Logos will not reach most women. Should we spend out time talking about outliers? That's not a particularly effective use of resources.
>>17376
>Logos
E Michael Jones fags are anti-White
(117.23 KB 989x574 2.jpg)
>>17353
>There are women on the internet so just gonna ignore that.
I know there are, since I am >>17350 and I am also a woman. You missed the point of the screenshot I specifically posted, and which is the very reason I NEVER say I am a woman on the internet, today being the first time ever I am making an exception just for you.
>Only the incels lacking self-esteem claim that women are weak.
I am no incel and I strongly disagree. We are factually weaker, admitting it does not imply inferiority as crazy feminists usually imply.

>>17359
Look, I basically agree with you here
>But that doesn’t mean they are superior to one another to the point of insulting, degrading or physically damaging.
In fact it often happened when debating about these issues to find the dumb LARPer who believes being a fascist or a national socialist means that he will live in a White version of the muslim shitholes where he can use women as real dolls baby makers or something.
I see this is frustrating, but rest assured that real men and real fascists despise that semitic bullshit just as you and I do.
I for one welcome a world shaped on the irl example of National Socialist societies like in Germany, where women partecipated willingly and happily in society according to their role as women for the well-being of fatherland, and without being degrated or brutalized or treated as lesser beings.
>>17387
>actual posting tits
The absolute state of trad women
>>17390
kek
I've been lurking imageboards for years, this is the first time I ever post a picture of myself. Just for you, Neinchan.
I could have just said "I am a woman too, lol" without proof like >>17346 did, but the truth is that you can post on anonymous boards and discuss just fine without the need to point out you're a girl, even when debating the specific issue of women and politics.
To be honest I do it all the times and blend perfectly, on here like on many other places I lurk.
>not posting your bare tits
the level of femanons nowadays smh
>>17394
seconded kek
>>17387
You look kinda fat tbh.
>>17394
this
>>17399
Not going to happen, I an not going to post anything else.
>>17401
you already walked on the slippery slope. do it now or gtfo
>>17401
git out then
>>17399
yeah man, truly pathetic. s(he) might as well not come here at all
>>17401
>she thinks she can get away this easily
for your kikery post pussy
>>17406
seconded
>>17406
based
post pussy to prove you arent femboi
(81.04 KB 220x138 157428965422.gif)
>>17402
>>17403
Alright, bye then.
See you tomorrow
you arent coming back
>>17406
This. I bet she'd show it to a black man but not Aryan ubermenschen like us. Smh
>>17412
>tomorrow
or never, femkike. get shoah'd
Kek, one thot posts in this thread and the PPH of this board more than quadruples.
>>17412
>banned for not posting tits
BASED
(221.13 KB 899x715 whore.png)
>>17387
Not this cancer again. It's a hispanic with absolutely disgusting tits, she/it posts everywhere. Ban it before it ruins the board
>crypto-feminist comes in and starts whining about how based and trad she is just like men
>gets told she shouldn't be in politics
>keeps saying how based and trad she is and how much she loves her race and crying about incels and muh wet holes
>starts posting pics of her chest
LMAO point proven. Women should not be politically involved
>>17379
No idea who that is. Logos goes back to greek philosophy. Some new jewtube eceleb doesn't own it.

>>17387
>White version of the muslim shitholes where he can use women as real dolls baby makers or something.
I don't think anyone but teenagers believe this. There are definitely teenagers here.

>and happily in society according to their role as women for the well-being of fatherland
>according to their role
See, you think when I say followers, it's an insult. You also think I hate my wife. Neither is true, but to not accept how things usually are is to not accept reality.

Tastefully done tits. Don't listen to: >>17390
Tits or GTFO is a bit of a trap. No tits, no woman, tits and you are a slut. Not really fair, but that said, women tend to fuck up anonymous boards because of general male thirst. And in general we believe our words should stand on their own without anything else.

>>17413
Anon, your mental inferiority complex is showing.
>>17449
Kek, if you only knew...
(970.35 KB 1173x942 white knight.png)
>>17440
Pathetic White knight
>>17451
>>17452
>>17453
Kek. I have a wife and kids. Just got laid 10 mins ago. Anyway, this was a topical thread for her to weigh in on.

Nothing I said was untrue.
tips fedora
kek
>>17455
>>17453
>>17452
Can someone explain the psychology behind Whiteknight faggitry to me? There are a handfull of us here in this discussion, a supposed female is introduced and suddenly a Whiteknight materializes. Wtf is that shit, how many among us are there that think that its in our best interest to Whiteknight like this on average? How do I premptivly identify Whiteknights to avert exposure to this kind of faggitry?
>>17458
There are plenty of lurkers who aren't "us" who can post stupid shit at any time
>>17459
But dont you think its odd that the not "us" people would choose to lurk here in the first place?
I mean, Im not into homosex, so I dont go to gay boards and lurk so IDK why a Whiteknight fag would lurk here is he doesnt share our opinion..
>>17460
Kek, all women on the internet are fat. I learned that many years ago. I'm over fucking fatties, and I have never picked up on the internet.

I have email addresses that are older than you are.
>>17458
It's instinctual. You never know who it could erupt in at any time, but it's probably most common with beta males and other non-chads. Someone may seem like a good redpilled individual until a female is introduced, turning them into a massive cuck. This poster >>17460 summed it up pretty well.
>>17460
But everyone knows /pol boards dont often attract femanons and its not like Whiteknighting some trapp is going to actually get him the opportunity to meat said person irl and get them sex. Are they just retarded and desparate?
>>17465
>I have email addresses that are older than you are.
Okay boomer
>>17466
>jewish lurker
Sometimes I think this is whats really going on. That there is some jidf fag and his femanon coworker posting on these boards. Because logic tells us that even if some landwhale agreed to love us for Whiteknighting on the board, she is likley in an entirrly different part of the world and youll never get to fuck, and there is way better hotter porn online than some fat pile of shit fingering some undefinable crevace on her body
>>17477
Top laugh
>oy vey! Why does everyone kick us out of their nation. We're just trying to help keep the internet safe, goy.
Fucking jews, man.
>thread on red pilling women
>woman shows up
>out out out
kek, do you anons have no sense of irony?
>>17487
Kek
Its not even a man posting as a woman, its a fucking jew posting as a human.
>>17486
I know the customs. Just because it's a custom doesn't mean it's fair. And frankly, just pointing out the custom isn't fair doesn't make me a White knight. Everything else in the post was disagreeing with her.
Oy vey, it's getting late in tel aviv, time to go to bed.
>>17494
Yeah, yeah, I know, nothing is fair in life.

>>17496
Ok, ok, you anons win, I'll go back to shutting my mouth.
(1.99 MB 500x281 giphy.gif)
>>17492
Im still just a poor nufag, pleb on this board. Give me time to properly develop
>>17500
Maybe when summer hits so I can help fight off the summerfags that may discover nein once memes start bleeding into plebbit.
>>17508
We'll see.
So let me get this straight: the person who made this post >>17350 is allegedly the same that posted here >>17387 ?
To be honest if she didn't make the second post I would have not even noticed any "femininity", I actually agree with the answer she gave, she just tried too hard when standing her ground with the supposed other femanon that wrote the post here >>17346

Ladies, just another proof that "There are no girls on the internet" is a golden rule, I recommend to follow it all the times.
>>17540
Basic shill tactics. s(((he))) made the first post too >>17346 and then replied to it in a pseudo based manner to gain support and psyop people who can't tell that both were written like a woman (or a swede, or a jew, it's hard to tell between the three) by using hidden assumptions and other logical fallacies to shift the discussion away from the conclusion of lobotomizing all females. There was a really good post on cuckchan where an anon broken down a roastie's post to show how to identify feminine writing. I don't have it saved on my computer, it would be great if any anon had and could post it.
>>17555
You should go easy with the tinfoil hatterism now. Come on.
>>17556
So you don’t believe me, but do you believe my trips?

I’m not saying it’s some alphabet agency, I’m just saying that’s what people do when come here to spread ideas in bad faith.
>>17556
Imagine being this retarded
(257.90 KB 900x1214 identifyroastie.jpg)
>>17555
Here's the pic you were looking for, anon

also checking them trips
>>17620
Thanks, anon. It was one of the best things to come out that site. Shame it’s all but gone now, they should have taken these teachings to heart.
>>17623
>That was the exact reason why I didn’t post any pics
Then you shouldn't have HURR DURR I AM A WOMAN to begin with.
At least the other girl was coherent and posted proof while you just sperged around.
Now, you know the rules whore:
Tits or GTFO
>>17624
>At least the other girl was coherent and posted proof
If that's even a girl or a human in our case. If you're so into kike boobs go ask her out.
I'm not gonna display my body like a slut otherwise I would be contradicting myself. So nope.
And I'm not going anywhere.
>>17387
Hey sweetie, I apologize on behalf of all the other kissless virgin Anons. Please hmu on discord ;)
die faggot
>>17623
>reason why I didn’t post any pics in the first place
then don't fucking announce that you are a woman, it is completely irrelevant you bitch
>>17630
It's irrelevant to do it on an anonymous imageboard, and the first reply the other girl gave you explained just that. Then her posting timestamped proof further highlighted your hypocrisy.
Now post tits or shut your whore mouth for good.
>>17630
>The moment I told my friends about my opinions of the invaders and jews they declared me a neo-nazi bitch and shut me out for good.
You want the truth? If you were hot, they wouldn't have done that. Get over to /SIG/ and get in shape. As a woman you don't even need to lift much, just stop shoveling food in your gullet. I tell people some of my views, I am anti-immigrant, etc. But I'm in shape, so no one says a damn thing. You should also somewhat hide your power level, you can red-pill people, but it must be in small doses. When one bit of the pill is swallowed, you can give the next one, but if they spit it back up you can advance no farhter.

Now show us your enormous tits, so I can complement them and have the board rail against me again in a spasm of anger.
>>17632
PS, the JQ is the final red pill. Save it for last, it's the toughest one to swallow.
>>17631
this
>>17632
fellow anon gets it. you're a woman so it is easier for you to make yourself liked in a group of people, if you're good looking no one bats an eye that you're a nazi, and some thirsty boys will go as far as roleplaying nazis in front of you.
>>17633
final redpills depend on the person and from what point of view they see the world
17632
>You want the truth? If you were hot, they wouldn't have done that.
>If you're good looking no one bats an eye that you're a nazi,
Trying to play into my need to prove myself as a pretty woman eh? Not provoked. Not gonna post pics.
I come from a place where pretty much everyone (even grandmas) has beautiful faces and nice bodies, so the looks don’t earn you much. It’s mainstream.
>>17633
>PS, the JQ is the final red pill
Yeah found it out in a bitter way before I met chans.
>>17633
>PS, the JQ is the final red pill. Save it for last, it's the toughest one to swallow.
Not even close. There are many pills to swallow after the JQ. Some people are aware of the JQ and aren't even aware of all the biological differences between the genders, as evidenced by this thread.
>final redpills depend on the person and from what point of view they see the world
This, after the JQ, there is still the Evola-pill, the Spengler-pill, the SIEGE-pill, and many other's. If I were to mention all of them, too many people would sperg out and this thread would be derailed even further
>>17635
>I come from a place where pretty much everyone (even grandmas) has beautiful faces and nice bodies, so the looks don’t earn you much. It’s mainstream.
Tell me of this far away land. I will make a point to visit there, I haven't taken a vacation in forever. I sad, live in burgerland, overrun with short, fat mamacitas. The local scenery is gag inducing. Thank god I'm married, this town would be fucking brutal, I'd have to acquire a taste for pudge.

>>17636
>and aren't even aware of all the biological differences between the genders, as evidenced by this thread.
I think the men are aware of the differences, the women try to believe it's only physical prowess. That's an ego thing, and you may never be able to have people accept that. And honestly, I doubt many people (women or men) on here are low IQ. So we are a bunch of outlier talking about the general population, and saying how we are each exceptional, and we actually may be. It wouldn't be hard for an outlier female to be smarter than 70% of men, and thus think none of what we are talking about applies.

INTJ masterrace motherfuckers
>>17634
>fellow anon gets it. you're a woman so it is easier for you to make yourself liked in a group of people, if you're good looking no one bats an eye that you're a nazi, and some thirsty boys will go as far as roleplaying nazis in front of you.
I actually keked. It's true, I straight up didn't go far enough in my post. I have seen dudes become ballet aficionados overnight in a transparent attempt to hook some poon.
>>17635
i don't need to see a pic one whore when i have thousand of them on a click of my mouse. i'm saying the experience with your friends would be different if you were good looking or above. no matter where, looks earn you general niceness and favors at the very least
>>17636
agree, people also start with different redpills, so their order can be mixed
>>17637
i would say most people, even normalfags are somewhat aware of it, but someone being fully aware of all of them is rare
another INTJ bro checking in
>>17639
yeah man, it is painful to see your fellas become spineless retards at a premise of pussy or just female attention alone
>>17630
calm your tits cunt you know on chans gender is irrelevant and you should just make good posts by anouncing you are a woman you are just looking for attention
>>17630
check this retard out
(76.74 KB 774x960 hey.jpg)
>>17646
This.
She actually made it worse by REEEEEEing against the other thot, calling her whore and whatnot after being told she was the reason for the derailing to begin with.

Anyway, rate my pussy and tits /pol/
(55.13 KB 604x516 pepecat.jpg)
>>17653
qt pussy bro 8/10 would pet
>>17653
Fug. 9/10 super fluffy. Definitely underage though. Dammit anons, there's a no Chilled pepsi rule on nein. Reported.

>>17644
>it is painful to see your fellas become spineless retards at a premise of pussy or just female attention alone
I could possibly respect it if it ever worked, but it never ever does. Why compromise yourself when you have a 100% chance of failure? The girl was actually embarrassed for ballet bro. Worst strike out I have ever seen.
>>17637
It’s impossible to truly imagine yourself as someone more capable that what you already are, either more intelligent or less fem-brained.
>>17737
WTF does this even mean? Is it an insult to my intelligence? Are you ESL?

People overestimate their abilities all the time, especially stupid ones. In fact, the stupider you are, the more you tend to overestimate your abilities.
>>17743
You can’t make decisions as if you were smarter than you really are. If you could, then you would actually be that smart.
Women are mindless slampig cattle.
>>17775
if you were actually smart, you'd just be an anon. anyways, how old are you, are you married, and with kids?
(148.49 KB 816x979 1578206432355.jpg)
>>17766
I agree
>>17775
Wait, did you think I was talking about you? I'm agreeing with you, my point is that women can never have any idea what is like to be man, to feel emotions and respond to stimuli in the same way we do. The reverse is also true, only less so as men are more robust beings (at the cost of lacking a womb and tits), and it is possible (not easy) to imagine yourself as slower, weaker, or lesser than what you are. The differences are so numerous that the chance of a true outlier is a statistical impossibility.
>>17783
genx, married, kids.

>>17786
Sorry anon, I wasn't following you at all. The more terse one is, the more pronouns one uses, the more ambiguous and easy to misunderstand.

I don't spend my time imagining myself as weaker, but it's not like my physical strength ends many arguments either. Men and women are different, I can't possibly imagine myself as one, there's so many variables. Neither can my wife imagine herself as a man, sometimes I share my perspective, and she's pretty astonished.

Either way, there's a place for women in a White nation. It's not the same as men, and it's not a secondary place, but it's different.

I'm not bragging here, but there's a different perspective when you have lived longer and been married a while. I assume I am older than most in here, you will all have your time. At least I hope you all will, and I'd be happy to share any knowledge I have. Unfortunately, the path is hard, and there are so many diversions and distractions today. I don't envy the younger generations.
>>17786
why spend time trying to imagine myself in someone else's skin, let alone a woman's, when i can get better at being a man
>>17787
married anon, what advice would you give to the men and women in this thread to look in for in a partner?
>>17785
Islam is based and blackpilled about women, but they're also going under Weimarization.
>>17793
They also like to rape male children.
>>17795
Oh yeah, I know about the bacha bazi stuff in Afghanistan. Same stuff with the (((elites))) as well.
>>17793
they're not blackpilled about women, they're red pilled. When you turn all your emotions off and think only about the efficiency of your civilization, you realize that they are right.

>>17795
>muh rape children
That only happens in very specific countries (like Afghanistan) and does not reflect on Islam as a whole.
In most Islamic countries, you'd even get the death sentence for doing that.

>inb4 muh Achmed
I'm not a Muslim. I'm merely making observations about Islam.
There's no reason why Muslims would post here to begin with.
>>17788 (heil)
>married anon, what advice would you give to the men and women in this thread to look in for in a partner?
I used to have a big list. But after some thought, it mostly comes down to the ability to delay gratification.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_marshmallow_experiment
>In this study, a child was offered a choice between one small but immediate reward, or two small rewards if they waited for a period of time. During this time, the researcher left the room for about 15 minutes and then returned. The reward was either a marshmallow or pretzel stick, depending on the child's preference. In follow-up studies, the researchers found that children who were able to wait longer for the preferred rewards tended to have better life outcomes, as measured by SAT scores,[2] educational attainment,[3] body mass index (BMI),[4] and other life measures.[5]

This is what separates us from the niggers. If you didn't have the ability to store food for the winter, you, and your family would die. Niggers don't have much winter, food is always available, so they didn't develop the ability to save anything for later.

If your wife can't help but spend every dollar that comes into the house, if she can't keep herself in decent shape, if she can't do chores, your life with her will definitely suck. If she can't keep of Chad's dick, even though Chad just wants to fuck and chuck her, your life with her will suck.

Signs of this are usually pretty obvious, tats, fat, never has any money, etc.

But to be able to choose, you must have choices.
>But to be able to choose, you must have choices.
<But to be able to choose, you must have choices.

Yep, I wrote that three times, because it's so important. You must also be able to pass the marshmallow test. Do you lift? Do you watch your weight? Can you suffer to gain an education and a decent job? Or are you a nigger stuffing your face with cheetos? Can you suffer in the gym? Can you suffer the sting of rejection, when you get laughed at when you approach women?

People don't realize that to get in a relationship, you have to have something to offer. Are you a half-eaten cheeseburger in the trash can that only a vagrant would eat, or are you a fine steak? Anons often get fatalistic about this. They are ugly, they are spergs, etc. Most things can be fixed or minimized, unless you are seriously deformed on the level of hotwheels. I'm an ugly motherfucker, and was a bean pole. I dressed well, took care of myself and maxed out on charisma, that worked for me pretty good 20 years ago. Now I'm a bit more coarse, I dress like a construction worker, but I have much more muscle on my frame now (not a mass monster, just "fit"). Both ways though, I had something to offer.

I like it better the way I am now, but if I found myself divorced, I'd have to up my charisma once again. A fit frame will get you in the door, but you have to have some charisma to close the deal.

So, what are you offering? You must offer value to get value.
>>17816
You're too into impressing women. Women don't have agency. Appeal to strong fathers and have them arrange their daughter to you in marriage. That's it.
(71.48 KB 600x479 whitesnotproblem.jpg)
>>17788
>why spend time trying to imagine myself in someone else's skin, let alone a woman's, when i can get better at being a man
To learn what they might want and need to better work with them.

>>17787
No worries, bro.

>>17816
Delaying gratification is just a short way to test for IQ. There are 5 big personality traits people have too (like myers-briggs but simpler) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Five_personality_traits

Are those important too, or do none of them matter?

>>17880
She will have an easier time convincing her father to not arrange a marriage than you will in convincing him to arrange it, or she will just fuck off (literally) if she really doesn’t like you. It shouldn’t be that way, but it’s too hard to change it now.

>>17888
Checked. Except Whites tolerated the existence of jews and their shabbos goys, bought into their lies hook, line, and sinker, and allowed them to take over their countries, media, and schools. That’s a problem.
>>17918
>Delaying gratification is just a short way to test for IQ. There are 5 big personality traits people have too (like myers-briggs but simpler)
I wouldn't say that's always true. I know a lot of "smart" people who are total niggers with their money. As to the other "personality traits" I'd say season to personal taste. There are plusses and minuses to each. That there is a vetting process at all is a major win. Too many guys marry the first girl that will fuck them with no vetting. That's just disaster.

>>17880
I have many cow with with to buy your daughter. Is good deal, three cow, I would give four if she were real blonde, but I know is only hair dye.

That time has long gone anon, stop watching "leave it to beaver" and look at the world the way it is today.
>>17948
>look at the world the way it is today
wtf I accept multiculturalism and never want to go back to a monoracial society again

thanks for letting me see how that time is long gone and how we must all accept the systems of the world the way it is today
>>17948
>I wouldn't say that's always true. I know a lot of "smart" people who are total niggers with their money.
The marshmallow test you quotes corresponds nicely with SAT tests, probably the most popular IQ alternative (but not the best because edu-jew). Will power is also test, but that’s just conscientiousness, one of the big 5. No offense, dude, but you should know this.
(16.02 KB 205x162 Swastikatree.jpg)
>>17960
Please put away your autism for a minute here. Yes, marshmallow test is correlated with intelligence, but collaboration isn't an ironclad relationship, it's merely statistically significant. It really says nothing about any one individual. Further, my use here is figurative. Woman can't stop looking at men's crotches (yes I have seen this)? Fail. Have a decent job, you car breaks and you can't fix it because you have no money? Fail. Payday comes and she goes straight to the mall? Fail. One drink at a restaurant with you, Chad says hi and you don't exist anymore? Fail.

>Will power is also test, but that’s just conscientiousness
I wouldn't agree with that at all.

But that's not my point either. You can call things what you want, they are labels. Willpower, marshmallow test, conscientiousness (though I disagree on that one).

You are too worried about definitions, to see my overarching advice. You are down in the weeds when you need to be at the 1000ft view. Pic related.

Loosen up, stop thinking there's one answer. The real thing you should have read was this
>That there is a vetting process at all is a major win. Too many guys marry the first girl that will fuck them with no vetting. That's just disaster.
and this
>People don't realize that to get in a relationship, you have to have something to offer.
and that a girl should have some level of self-restraint.
>>17960
If it makes you feel better, how about this: Find a smart girl. It's also really nice when your kids aren't stupid.

I also know too many people like this. The grandfather was wealthy, married a smoking hot, but dumb woman. Son inherited money, did the same. Grandson is a barely functional idiot.
>>17975
>Will power is also test, but that’s just conscientiousness
Typo, should read willpower is also tested [in the marshmallow test], but that's just [another name for the personality trait] conscientiousness.

But anyway, so a mix of intelligence and conscientiousness is what you look for? Nice. I'd think introversion would be a plus, possibly low openness too. I'd also think moderate neuroticism and agreeableness would be good, on the extreme she'll either be hard to deal with or flake off.

>Pic related.
Although you can do much worse, I don't think it's a good idea to look for an Eva Braun clone
1.Is that true, that "male is introvert",when "female is extrovert" by nature ?
2.And if it's true, that "autistic female" is demonstrating a male mentality rather than woman one ?
3.If all of these statements are true, can you give a link to some scientific research, which proves this ?

Sorry, if a question is too primitive and banal.

t. 17 y/o /pol/lack refugee from 4kike.
>>17978
>Typo, should read willpower is also tested [in the marshmallow test], but that's just [another name for the personality trait] conscientiousness.
I understood exactly what you were trying to say. Still disagree.

>But anyway, so a mix of intelligence and conscientiousness is what you look for?
My wife is high intelligence, but low conscientiousness. So I guess not. It's really not the same as you keep saying.
I'm high intelligence and medium conscientiousness. I have to hammer her about getting some important stuff done, but she's also not doing completely stupid shit.

>Nice. I'd think introversion would be a plus, possibly low openness too. I'd also think moderate neuroticism and agreeableness would be good, on the extreme she'll either be hard to deal with or flake off.
Again, many of these traits aren't clear wins. You might think agreeableness would be good in a spouse, but they aren't just agreeable with you, they are agreeable with everyone else too, if you believe of this as a personality trait. Think of all the ways this could be good or bad. High agreeableness might lead to her getting scammed all the time, etc. It's easier to see the downside of disagreeableness with you, but can you see it being a plus when she's out in the world and you aren't around?

I have had to actually coach my wife on being more disagreeable (though I didn't think of it as this at the time.) If someone at work said she fucked something up, she would automatically assume they were right. If someone says I fucked something up, I go "Oh, really? Well, let's take a look." You can see how the first example you could get steamrolled often...

>Although you can do much worse, I don't think it's a good idea to look for an Eva Braun clone
The pic was really just about how you were down in the details and couldn't see the overall pattern because of it. You are sitting on the ground, in the details, you see some trees, some rocks, etc, but you can't see the big swastica because of what you are focused on.
I could have substituted in the parable about the three blind men describing an elephant. You aren't seeing the big picture. It's also why I asked you to put your autism aside. You need to see things from multiple perspectives, and the lack of multiple perspectives is why you are acting like these traits are "good" or "bad."
IMHO, there was a different personality assessment that I like better, it had 4 categories and on each of these, there was a "default" level of each and another for what you can push yourself to if you needed to / under pressure. Can't remember the name though. That's more interesting to me than saying you are "messy" or "conscientious". My garage is a total mess, but I keep important paperwork very organized... But I fear this is just going to give you another framework to latch onto.
>>17978
How about this. I find your view here incredibly narcissistic. That is you are only considering your wife's traits in direct reference to YOU, and NOT as an mostly autonomous member of your team. You can't (and shouldn't) direct every single action of her wife, she needs skills and traits not only to interact with you, but also others.
>>17982
Good questions, big 5 by gender: http://midus.wisc.edu/findings/pdfs/1779.pdf table 1 is what you want to look at.

There is only a small difference in openness and intro/extroversion between the genders, I don't think it's all that significant. Women rank noticeably higher in all the others, and it makes sense evolutionary speaking. You want women to be agreeable to kids, diligent in caring for them, and worried if something might happen to them.

If I to guess on the intro/extroverted female questions, I'd say that being extroverted would make women more willing to spend time with their kids and more able to be integrated into a different culture if the need arose, it serves to multiply their agreeableness. Just make sure you aren't confusing the two, a mans unwillingness to "work well" with others could easily be called introversion when it is really just low agreeableness. The reverse is also true, which is why I don't think the intro/extroversion gender question is relevant.

A more interesting is are low-agreeableness females demonstrating a male mentality. I'd also say the answer is no. I think the female-male duality is something outside the big 5, a female mentality more passive where a male is more active. The combination of agreeableness, contentiousness, and neuroticism is relevant to being more nurturing, but not to male/female mentality as a whole. So an autistic female would, perhaps, not be a nurturing one, but would still be a feminine one. Keep in mind that the traditional idea of nurturing is not necessarily the best in the abstract, certainly not going forward. High neuroticism might cause a woman to become a tiger mom and high agreeableness is an increasingly bad trait for boys to inherit the the multiculti world.

>>17984
>I understood exactly what you were trying to say. Still disagree.
What? That is as close to a fact as you can get, the mass of an electron is more uncertain then that. It is in the source you gave me. Are you Paul Krugman [Obligatory ((())) in case you can't tell from the name] because this is a Krugman Kontradiction if I've ever seen one.

But you know, for all your writing, I don't think you read my analysis of what are good personality traits and what are not, or even what I think is good what isn't.
From a question like this:
>>17788
>married anon, what advice would you give to the men and women in this thread to look in for in a partner?

to an answer like this: >>18005
is to my original point here: >>17975
that you are off lost in the weeds.

Science and studies aren't going to give you the answers you seek. Unless you think you can walk up to someone in a bar with a briggs-myers questionaire, and not get laughed at like the autistic anon you clearly are (which I mentioned you should attempt to turn off here: >>17975).

You think there's an answer in the data, but there's no answer in the data. To the extent that there IS an answer in the data, you have to generalize and take a high level view. But you want to get deeper and deeper into the data thinking that maybe, maybe if you really ask all the questions, you find the pattern down deep in the data, you will get the right answer. But it's all just noise.

You are down looking at the veins in a leaf, and missing that someone played a joke and made a swastika with all the trees.

>But you know, for all your writing, I don't think you read my analysis of what are good personality traits and what are not, or even what I think is good what isn't.
I read it, but my analysis of what you are saying is still this: >>17991
You are only considering YOUR relationship with a future wife, and the traits you would like to see, and not realizing that how your wife interacts with the world at large is also a factor you should consider. Your wife isn't only going to interact with you, and these traits (if they are real) would also influence how she interacts with others.
>>18008
> Your wife isn't only going to interact with you, and these traits (if they are real) would also influence how she interacts with others.
Let's make it real with a 1950s style scenario.

She's agreeable with you, let's see how she interacts with others.

WifeAnon: Oh, I have to make dinner for my love, Anon. Out of meat, off to the store!
OyVeyButcher: Hello, goy, I mean, miss, what would you like today?
WifeAnon: That steak there looks nice.
OyVeyButcher: Oy vey, you don't want that one, you want this one. <shows shitty steak>
WifeAnon: You know, if I weren't so agreeable, I'd tell you I want the other, better steak for my love. But since I'm not, that steak is just fine for us. You really do know better Mr OyVeyButcher.

WifeAnon: Here's the steak I cooked for you. I saw a really nice one, but Mr OyVeyButcher said goy, I mean you, would like this one better. Looks kind of tough though.
Anon: ...
(6.14 KB 194x259 urmumwomb.jfif)
>>18010
Pic related is your mother's womb. I never said high agreeableness was good. I said moderate agreeableness was good. Too low and you will never convince your lazy slob of a wife to get off her ass and file the taxes or get plowed by a negro bull or where else is important to you. So much for your vaunted high IQ, what is it, 115? 120? Absolute midwit.
>>18028
Kek. 140 and I have a degree in statistics. But please tell me more about your statistical analysis of a future mate.
>>18040
I have never mentioned nor used statistics before in this thread in anyway. I think 110 is your IQ, borderline retarded. Even a 120 midwit wouldn’t pull stuff out their ass the way you can, unless they’ve done some anal stretching to really loosen it up. But you are enough of a faggot to have done something like that, so pick one.
>>18077
What do you think these frameworks are all based on? And you still completely miss my point that these navel gazing questions are utterly pointless.
>>18077
based reminder that you are literally fucking retarded if your iq is under 100 and the us should have instantly started a genocide when their average iq dropped under 100
>>18216
110-120 is worse than sub 100. Those people are too dumb to understand anything true but smart enough to convince themselves of their own BS, hence the name midwits. [Note: not all 110-120s are midwits and not all midwits are 110-120, but most are] The world would be a much better place if the only IQs were 100-110 and 120+. I would say 130+, but anything more restrictive and the manpower shortages would be too severe.
>>18225
Even herd thinking like most goys do can affect smart people but sub 100 is just not acceptable
It's fucking retarded that 90 is an acceptable iq in a lot of countries
>>18225
This
>Those people are too dumb to understand anything true but smart enough to convince themselves of their own BS, hence the name midwits.
Basically Plebbit.
>>18241
Sub 90 have no value except as warm bodies for manual labor. Sub 100 can do basic math and remember a few things to be cashiers or waiters. Those roles are fast disappearing, but no gone.
>>17975
Oof. That car one hit me hard.
My engine shat the bed on the highway and it's gonna be a $4000 repair. I started my job like a month ago, and just got finished paying off the debt I had. Here we go again, I suppose. Fuck it all.
>>18303
What's wrong with it? You can do a lot with a cheap socket set, breaker bar and youtube. I do nearly all my own repairs, I save a ton of money, and my car has over 200k miles on it.
>>18303
Buy a working beater for $500-$1000 and drive it while you fix the other car. Or better yet a small motorcycle. Motorcycles are very easy to fix and you have backup transport.
>>18323
It burned all the oil in under a month and metal started rubbing against metal. Full engine swap

>>18324
I ran the numbers and this is the best option. Fuck buying a beater, anything that gets sub 30 mpg isn't on the table for me. Already been down that rabbit hole.
>motorcycle
No thanks, I don't have a deathwish. I'd have to be really retarded to get one after 6 of my family friends died in motorcycle accidents.>>18323
>>18343
>It burned all the oil in under a month and metal started rubbing against metal
That's rough. The only DIY option is to lathe new parts for most of the engine, but you shouldn't do that on a whim.
>>18343
Fug, you need to pay better attention to your car. Didn't you see a low oil light or anything?

>I'd have to be really retarded to get one after 6 of my family friends died in motorcycle accidents.
Uh what the shit? Is your family a racing team? That's not normal.
>>18374
The oil light came on and off for seconds at a time but this car has had so many sensor glitches I assumed it was a false positive
And no, the riders weren't responsible for any of them. Shitty drivers bumped their handlebars with side view mirrors at 60mph or tried to cut them off in traffic leading them to spin out into a ditch or they got a triple rearend pileup that ended up hitting then last and flying them into a streetpole headfirst or they got T-boned or something else. There's no protection from shitty drivers at all, you roll the dice every time.>>18374
>>18372
Yeah, I have a family friend who's an experienced mechanic, he sniffed out a 50k mile engine and is now inspecting it. Already sent two back
>>18390
That might be the best argument against a cycle. At the very least, I'd upgrade my horn to something very loud. People didn't see me even when I drove my shitbox civic. Worse today, all the cars are so much bigger. You do have to anticipate other's stupidity also, you get a second sense for impending dumbassery.

At least you know an honest mechanic. But yeah, always check the oil if the light goes on, it's cheap insurance. Today's cars do cry wolf too often though.
>>18390
That might be the best argument against a cycle. At the very least, I'd upgrade my horn to something very loud. People didn't see me even when I drove my shitbox civic. Worse today, all the cars are so much bigger. You do have to anticipate other's stupidity also, you get a second sense for impending dumbassery.

At least you know an honest mechanic. But yeah, always check the oil if the light goes on, it's cheap insurance. Today's cars do cry wolf too often though.
>>17493
get cancer, retard
>>17493
homo boy
>>15797
Is she pure and White?
>yes
Then what's your problem? God forbid you're political life if you're wife doesn't agree with you.
>>17387
Nice jewess hair

About this thread, of course the biology and evidence is there for gender differences, but you can't have a successful movement leaving out women. So tone it down or shift rhetoric into something that sounds appealing. Anything but Black Pigeon Speaks MRA faggotry. Also, women voted in Hitler.
>>17633
Good to know I'm not a newfag.
(34.29 KB 464x480 1 greek 1.jpg)
>>18776
Your whore mom is a jew, faggot.
You eat very good kike D&C turds about only jews having curly hair.

Delete
Report/Ban

Captcha (required for reports and bans by board staff)


no cookies?