>Again, the ZOG-faggots absolutely thrive on the "Hey, I'm one of you, but..." approaches to political influence peddling. The ZOG-faggots will say anything they think can signal they're part of the in-group, then proceed to spew standard ZOG-politics, like "violence is wrong."
You are arguing like a Jew. This very thread not only proves nobody made an appeal to Republican politics, but I don't think anyone denied the fights come down our way that would require proper violence applied to traitors.
Yet I'm sure your next reply will be more "ZOG-faggot" + strawman argument + copious amoounts of italics
>This, from the ZOG-faggot screeching about how much he hates the Turner Diaries.
Hate? Show this.
>>Cracking down on armed evil whites who kill civilians is not what I'd call a problem for the ZOG.
>Translation: fighting a violent White Nationalist rebellion isn't a problem for the ZOG!
>ZOG-faggots will say anything to keep people from fighting the ZOG.
We didn't speak of a rebellion.
A clear war by the ZOG against organized and armed white militias is quite different from isolated whites going on more or less successful solo rampages against colored people.
Your arguments are solely based on false dilemma and complete generalizations.
It's obvious that the moment Whites are truly forming a second army and leading a civil war, then ZOG will have a right to panic and yet, try to crush us. But even a hundred Tarrants (and we'll never get there in this same fashion) hardly makes for a civil war.
>Yes, and that's a great thing. Every time the original Nigger Integrationist "party" has to go and denounce White Nationalism, that's a great thing for those who want to see that interracial homosexual porno called "America" go up in flames.
It's only a great thing if you can educate Whites about what all of this means. Many redpills came from either youtube, alt-right websites or the chans. All of which are progressively censored in varied ways after Tarrant's little murderous ballad.
We're aiming for a small conversion percentage, but it will not be possible to achieve this conversion if we can't even propagate our message and truths.
>These people are openly hostile to the interests of the masses of the White Nation, while the Republican "Party" has to pretend to care about the masses of the White Nation. That's the difference. When the fraudsters are forced to go on TV and denounce the people they pretend to represent, that's a political victory for revolutionary White Nationalism.
First of all, I know what Democrats and Republicans do.
Second, you're wrong since you think the Republicans claimed to be openly pro-white.
Have you realized that Trump was just a (Zionist) civnat officially aiming for nothing more than, at best, reestablishing the immigration quotas from the 60s?
Show me the high profile pro-white and anti-nigger Republicans and you may have a point.
>Again, the ZOG-faggot thinks what the Electric-Jew says matters
It does. That's how you control people's opinions and even manage to lead them to war when they'd be staunchly against months before.
A nice false flag plus some propaganda and you're good to go.
Were you born yesterday or what?
>This ZOG-faggot thinks like a political consultant to an election campaign, not someone trying to organize a military force.
Sure, and you are organizing this military force? I'm impressed.
>No, ZOG-faggot. During the phase of the White Nation Liberation War, when the forces of revolutionary White Nationalism are recruiting soldiers to the cause, we're going to be asking that to anyone even close to the age of 30. And if we don't like the answer, the person might just eat a bullet right then and there.
Ok, you're really up there in fantasy autism. Reminder that your question was why my 30+ older brother isn't dead then.
Good luck asking your recruitment questions to people who should, according to your logic, be dead as a mark of their struggle for Whites.
You're definitely a complete retard.
Nope you clown, you said people above 30 should be shot.
You'd be surprised to see how many people in their 30s were top leaders of the far right in Germany back then.
Your argument is also completely stupid because I never denied once the fact that the youth is going to achieve change. So call me when you'll have grown a brain and learned to read.