/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Politically Incorrect

Mode: Reply
Name
Subject
Message

Max message length: 4096

Files

Max file size: 25.00 MB

Max files: 10

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

Remember to follow the rules


(546.73 KB 564x527 NoBourgeoisiePerversions.png)
(397.15 KB 500x376 NoSubhumanNoProblem.png)
(188.61 KB 800x600 NotMyComrade.png)
(1.25 MB 560x902 RaceMixingIsBourgeoise.png)
(480.74 KB 700x393 TheSovietWay.png)
(298.78 KB 550x649 WeWillFindYou!.png)
(485.84 KB 881x499 AThreatToTheBourgeoisie.png)
(358.27 KB 1920x1080 pjimage.jpg)
(368.81 KB 569x800 The2ndSolution.png)
Stalinist Communism Anti (((Marxist))) Posters for Dissemination Dimitri 09/13/2019 (Fri) 05:39:03 Id:02b689 No. 4508
There is a difference between Stalinist Communism
and
International GloboHomo (((Marxism)))
>>4508
Explain the difference, gommrade.
What is the underlying world view of Gommunism?
>>4508
Also, you cant maymay.
The ZOG hated the USSR because the Bolsheviks said niggers in that thing called "America" belong to a different Nation, and that Kikes are not a Nation at all.
The ZOG also thought they deserved more respect from the USSR, because they forced integration with niggers on the White Nation and called it "Civil Rights."
The aging, decrypted piles of shit from that era of forced integration are the current rulers of the ZOG, and they think they can get away with screeching "communism!" Again.
The ZOG has known that Marxist-Leninists in developing countries are always Nationalists since (at least) 1949, and have stated as much in internal memos (see the 1949 Dean Acheson memo on Vietnam).
But the ZOG-Boomers want you to pretend these people are the equivalent of the Democratic "Party." A party, mind you, that they themselves are in a purity spiral with over which one loves niggers more.
>>4508
This is the only form of communism I can get into.
>>4514
It's not a coincidence that all those red diaper kikes in the 'Kwa huddled up in their shtetls and cooked up "American conservatism".
>>4514
>If ai sae zog all teh taime they will think im liek them
Why didn’t you answer my question, gomerade? here: >>4509
R U SHAI?
Give it a go.
Try you’re best.
Put your big boy pants on and have at it.
Isn’t that the reason you’re here?
Here, ill help *ahem*
Opposing degeneracy such as you indicate was hardly unusual for those times. WHY does stalin oppose them? Is it for generic reasons or is there something specific to gommunizm or stanizm that is more specifically opposed to it?
stalin was murdered by the kikes because he tried to de-kike russia
Serious cringe here
(604.03 KB 475x637 Gomrade.png)
>>4637
>If ai sae zog all teh taime they will think im liek them
Told you.

But wait!
>If ai sae WLP all teh taime they will think im liek them.
>If ai sae christcuck all teh taime they will think im liek them.
Its evolving, lol.
But please, gommrade. Do tell us the difference between maxzxism, gommunizum and stanizum.
You can try and blend in later. . .
>>4638
Didnt he die at 74 in 1953? Seems a bit long to wait, anon.
>>4737
You should read more Yockey instead of posting pictures of faggots from the West produced by Western society so you can better understand what the thread is trying to get across.
there's a difference between throat and lung cancer but it's still cancer
Stalin was kiked. Thats the problem. It was basically just Zionist Nationalism.
Death is preferable to communism. -Liberty Prime
>>4843
I don't want to speak for OP, but the very general gist of what Yockey was talking about wasn't a blanket endorsement of communism or that communism was an ultimately positive thing for Western civilization. It was that the Soviet occupation and presence in Eastern Europe was superficial as opposed to the Western/jewish occupation where retards don't even think they are occupied even as they are being genocided in real time.
>>4882
Except thats not what op is indicating. Hes claiming that stalinism was in some form our pal. A 'fellow traveller' and that it is meaningfully different to other forms of communism or the marxism from which it stems.
When asked to explain this he clams up like the lying little faggot he is, thus revealing his dishonesty and cowardice.
OP is afraid to get his precious ideals questioned because he isn’t convinced of their truth. So instead he tries to subvert with lies and half truths in the hopes of fooling us.
Op then forgets to take his meds >>4514 & >>4637 lol.

Yockey has nothing to do with this thread, fuck you very much.
>>4508
>>4514

But what about the communist gangster computer god?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4mb6gzu60U

ANSWER ME!


>>4959
And answer the fucking questions here you fucking nigger.
>>4508
Don’t come here making claims about your communist bullshit and not expect to get called out, faggot.
>>4959
>zog
they're called jews anon, that word is pretty kosher especially when it's used by a lefty
>>4986
ZOG= Zionist Occupied Government, newfag. Heebs are kikes, not Jews, biblical Jews genetically are the Palestinians, ashkenazis are khazars and European
(3.81 MB 200x360 lol jew.gif)
>>4995
Found the jew.
>>5062
>>4995
Correction, found the commie jew.
Hey jew, does israel have nukes?
Did the holocaust happen and if not should it?
>>4508
>There is a difference between Stalinist Communism and International GloboHomo (((Marxism)))
Explain the difference, gommrade.
What is the underlying world view of Gommunism?
Opposing degeneracy such as you indicate was hardly unusual for those times. WHY does stalin oppose them? Is it for generic reasons or is there something specific to gommunizm or stanizm that is more specifically opposed to it?

GIVE US SOME ANSWERS, GOMMERADE
>>4986
>they're called jews anon
The Kikes couldn't rule without millions of Christfaggot servants, who would gladly turn every white male into a faggot, and marry off every white woman to a nigger, if they thought the Sky-Kike demanded it. Christfaggots created Zionism in the first place. They are more Christfaggot Israel lovers in that thing called "America" than Kikes.
>>4982
>answer muh questions
I am not the person who made this thread.
Your question isn't asked in honesty. You have been taught by the ZOG to identify ZOG-liberalism as the samething as "communism." You think no one giving you answers somehow validates the moronic nonsense the 'Right' wing of the ZOG has filled your mind with. Given that you obviously aren't serious, why should anyone give you a serious answer?
Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin and Mao all viewed (male) homosexuality as bourgeois degeneracy. If you want specific citations, I can provide you with them.
Most of the early communists never made a serious issue of it. The '5 heads' all basically viewed it as bourgeois decadence. Marx and Engels exchanged particularly nasty letters, tearing into the faggots that were influential in the socialist-circles of Germany at the time. Engels specifically mentions it in a negative fashion when discussing the ancient Greeks in his Origins of the Family. Lenin's remarks are indirect, but can be found by searching for his views on Freudianism (he was hostile to it) and women. The early Soviet state even persecuted faggots and Orthodox priests for being kiddy molesters. People will tell you the Bolsheviks made kiddy-fucking legal, but that is just a myth, because they just abolished all Czarist laws about sex at the same time, and would recriminalize homosexuality in the 1930s, and explicitly associate it with European fascism (Rohm really was a faggot, the evidence is irrefutable).
Homosexuality would be treated like a mental illness in the USSR all the way up to the end. The European Union actually intervened with Boris Yeltsin early on to make it legal again.
All the communist parties everywhere have been historically hostile to faggots. There are no exceptions to this, though the Cubans did flip on it, and because of "Western" political pressure, many communist parties have tried to hide it or down play it. For instance, the KKE is Greece is a very anti-faggot party, but you would only know that if you followed the rest of the Greek "Left," who are all pro-faggot and hate the KKE for it.
The faggot identity today is an ideological weapon of the "West." The "Western" "Left" tries to define "Leftism" in terms of ones relationship to faggotry, and for the most part have been successful in shaping global "Left" attitudes on the question of faggots. This is traditional how the ZOG infiltrates the "Left" in a country, such as in Venezuela, where the PSUV is an anti-faggot party, while Guano's group is a socialist pro-faggot group.
This has basically always been the case. "Western" academy has produced countless monographs, books, academic articles, etc, detailing how much friendly the "West" was to faggots than communism. Faggots everywhere in the world essentially act as spies and saboteurs for the "West," which created the modern faggot identity in the first place, and spread it globally via Hollywood.
This should be all that needs to be said. The "West" pushes the faggot identity, and has been pushing it for decades now. The "West" literally invented the faggot identity, and has been competing with other sexual degenerate identities for well over a century now. The faggot identity not only competes with the modern tranny identity, but even displaced the Hijra identity in India, during the rule of the British.
In short, the ZOG loves faggot, and the USSR threw them in mental institutions as labelled them political dissidents.
>>5069
>The faggot identity today is an ideological weapon of the "West."
No, its an ideological weapon of the jew if your going to use the term ZOG at least apply it consistently, gommerade via the medium of cultural marxism.

And as a matter of fact i am quite serious.
But you failed to answer the actual questions raised by your op's first post >>4508
I have collected them here for your reading pleasure:

>There is a difference between Stalinist Communism and International GloboHomo (((Marxism)))
Explain the difference, gommrade.
What is the underlying world view of Gommunism?
Opposing degeneracy such as you indicate was hardly unusual for those times. WHY does stalin oppose them? Is it for generic reasons or is there something specific to gommunizm or stanizm that is more specifically opposed to it?

GIVE US SOME ANSWERS, GOMMERADE
>>5163
>No, its an ideological weapon of the jew
"Westerners" only believe in two identities: Kikes and faggots. Many, many pieces of shit besides the Kikes benefit from it, at the expense of the masses of the White Nation.
>cultural marxism
"Cultural Marxism" is a term invented by a ZOG-loving faggot to pretend the things he doesn't like about "America" are the result of a people 'Marxists' controlling the cultural institutions of "America" (you know, schools and the TV). This is not an exaggeration at all; just google William Lind to see what a Kike-lover he is.
>Explain the difference, gommrade.
Again, this ZOG-faggot is not serious. What part of "Globohomo hated the USSR and actually destroyed it" is hard for this ZOG-faggot to understand?
Guess what? The USSR also didn't force integration with niggers on the White Nation. That thing called "America" did. The Christfaggot servants of the Kikes who rule the 'Right' wing of the ZOG made sure it happened, to support their fellow nigger Christfaggot.
>>5216
>If ai sae zog all teh taime they will think im liek them >>4631
kek.
>The USSR also didn't force integration with niggers on the White Nation.
'Didn’t force' is a bit evasive, wouldn’t you say gommrade? Its like you’re trying to make us think gommunizm is racially aware when it isn’t.
But why would you do that?

And you still haven’t answered my perfectly reasonable questions . . .
>There is a difference between Stalinist Communism and International GloboHomo (((Marxism)))
Explain the difference, gommrade.
What is the underlying world view of Gommunism?
Opposing degeneracy such as you indicate was hardly unusual for those times. WHY does stalin oppose them? Is it for generic reasons or is there something specific to gommunizm or stanizm that is more specifically opposed to it?

GIVE US SOME ANSWERS, GOMMERADE
>>5300
The obvious difference between Stalinism and International GloboHomo is the lack of globohomo in Stalin's Russia. It couldn't be more clear in the overarching legacy that divergent postwar systems have left.

The remains of one is a bruised, but ascendant and wholly viable state that is a unique civilization in its own right. Russia is Russia. The other is a degraded nigger shitheap tilting at windmills over pronouns, salivating at imported spics taking on car loans, and impotently threatening anyone with weapons systems that don't work [thanks Iran] if they don't want Uncle Schmuel's greenback brand toilet paper. America and the "West" don't exist.
>>5302
Im asking about underlying principles, gommrade. Op claimed they were different then got all shy when asked for details.
>>5304
You're asking about the theoretical and the philosophical instead of the actual. That's why you keep getting called a dumbass ZOG-slave in this thread. Like it doesn't matter how clear it is RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU in the country you live in, you just keep pretending the narrative is real.

No matter how much evidence piles up, King Faisal's paid-for agitprop carries the day.
>>5308
No, im being call a zog bot because you cant answer the perfectly reasonable questions that were raised from op's post and you think no one will notice.
And that pic related is about nothing more than a power struggle between different colours of marxist shit.
Don’t spoon feed me a different colour of shit and pretend it matters, gommrade.
>>5308
Oh and this:

And you still haven’t answered my perfectly reasonable questions . . .
>There is a difference between Stalinist Communism and International GloboHomo (((Marxism)))
Explain the difference, gommrade.
What is the underlying world view of Gommunism?
Opposing degeneracy such as you indicate was hardly unusual for those times. WHY does stalin oppose them? Is it for generic reasons or is there something specific to gommunizm or stanizm that is more specifically opposed to it?

GIVE US SOME ANSWERS, GOMMERADE
>>5310
>different colours of marxist shit.
Not too many different colors in Stalin's Russia. One certainly dominated. Very different from the "West". Lots of colors there. That's the long and the short of it.

You don't need an explanation beyond the reality you live in. You like globohomo, you like niggers. You like usury. That's why these conversations with you have been so circular.
>>5300
>gommunism is the secret word Jesus gave me
Kill yourself, ZOG-faggot.
>'Didn’t force' is a bit evasive, wouldn’t you say gommrade?
No, it isn't, ZOG-faggot. It forces people to think about why the Zionists hated the USSR so much. Why did the Nigger Integrationist regime that rules that thing called "America" hate the USSR so much? ZOG-faggots like yourself can't give any coherent answers to this question, because to even attempt to do so exposes you as a moron who lives in a fantasy world of the ZOG's making.
>Its like you’re trying to make us think gommunizm is racially aware when it isn’t.
The 'Right' wing of the ZOG thinks Kikes are Europeans with 115 average IQs, and rule that thing called "America" because they deserve to. Being "racially aware" means identifying with Kikes to them.
>But why would you do that?
The ZOG hated the USSR because they said niggers in "America" belonged to another Nation, and Kikes aren't a Nation at all.
>And you still haven’t answered my perfectly reasonable questions . . .
Your question has already been answered, ZOG-faggot, you just don't like the answer, because it doesn't conform with your moronic worship of the ZOG.
>What is the underlying world view of Gommunism?
For the vast, vast majority of people that ever called themselves a communist, it was Nationalism, pure and simple.
Marxism-Leninism never works in places where they are unable to split a Nationalist movement, or are unable to build one themselves from the ground up. Moreover, the ZOG knew this as early as 1949, but probably much sooner (the first references I have found to the ZOG realizing this goes back to Secretary of State Dean Acheson's remarks on Ho Chi Minh).
Face it, you stupid ZOG-faggot. The ZOG lied to you. The ZOG killed a bunch of Nationalist gooks in Vietnam while forcing integration with niggers on the White Nation at home. The 'Right' wing of the ZOG is proud of this, cause it proves how not "collectivist" they are!
Vietnam (obvious, ZOG knew it too), Korea (guess which one cuts baby dicks in an ancient Middle Eastern ritual), Cambodia (super obvious, even went to war with Vietnam), China (Mao was an alternative central committee member of the KMT), Albania (super obvious), etc. Even the Bolsheviks used as much Nationalist sounding phrases as they could in the beginning (calling themselves the "All Russian" communist party at one point early on).
>WHY does stalin oppose them?
The USSR opposed faggots because the people they ruled over generally overwhelmingly hated them, and the people that hated the USSR (the ZOG, Israel, Sunni religious nutjobs, etc) all have embraced it, to one degree or another. Capitalism and degeneracy go hand in hand. Degenerates are the natural allies of capitalism, and always have been.
>>5308
>You're asking about the theoretical and the philosophical instead of the actual.
He is a religious person, and Christfaggots only hate the USSR because they were atheists. This, and this alone, forms the basis of all 'Right' wing ZOG lies the USSR, China, etc.
But even this isn't enough. The 'Right' wing of the ZOG then played the trick on the stupid whites (like the anon you're responding to), equating the "Left" wing of the ZOG to "communism." Strange how the ZOG was fine was killing millions of "communist" gooks in Korea and Vietnam, yet no similar massacre of "Left" ZOG-lings has ever occurred in that thing called "America." Why is that? The ZOG-faggot won't even attempt to give an ideological answer.
Another thing you will learn is that ZOG-faggots absolutely despise Nationalism. They think the National Identity of the White Nation is something they can play with, like a toy. One day, Kikes are darky Middle Easterners, the next day, they're fellow White Blood Brothers. There isn't a Nationalist bone in their bodies, they are playing a religious game, and "communism" has provoked a reaction from them not unlike two Christfaggot denominations angry at each other over some minor point of doctrine.
>Like it doesn't matter how clear it is RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU in the country you live in, you just keep pretending the narrative is real.
99.9% of ZOG-faggots, if given a choice between the ZOG as it is today, and an all-white Nation-State opposed to faggots, but it was ruled by a something calling itself "The Communist Party of the White Nation," they would choose the ZOG. And truthfully, they'd choose the ZOG over an all-white Nation-State that hated faggots and was ruled by a party called something like "The White Nation Workers' Party" that didn't mention anything about communism.
They don't hate "communism." They hate collective identity in any form that isn't Christfaggotry.
>>5313
>>5314
>>5313
>Not too many different colors in Stalin's Russia.
Russians and other Slavs are white, sure. But what about all the Asiatic and Turkic diversity in it? Are they white? The USSR was breddy diverse . . .
>You like globohomo, you like niggers. You like usury.
But i hate all of these things.
You arent answering the basic questions, gommrade. Thats why these conversations are so circular.
>why the Zionists hated the USSR so much. Why did the Nigger Integrationist regime that rules that thing called "America" hate the USSR so much?
You mean the jews, gommrade. Was it because apparently, stan kicked them all out? Or was it because jews like to pilpul everybody then profit from the conflict? Its like you’re using the term zog without any understanding of the jews or something? Odd.

>Its like you’re trying to make us think gommunizm is racially aware when it isn’t.
>The 'Right' wing of the ZOG thinks Kikes are Europeans with 115 average IQs, and rule that thing called "America" because they deserve to. Being "racially aware" means identifying with Kikes to them.
Doesn’t answer the question, gommrade. It evades it.
>The ZOG hated the USSR because they said niggers in "America" belonged to another Nation
But niggers are another Nation to white Americans. Because Nation is a thing of blood.
>Your question has already been answered
Citation needed.
>For the vast . . .
All of this is pilpul, btw.
>The USSR opposed faggots because the people they ruled over generally overwhelmingly hated them
Thats fine and all, but its not a world view. Is emotion the only basis or is there a REASON?
>religious person, and Christfaggots
No.
Replying to yourself, gommrade?
And you still haven’t answered my perfectly reasonable questions . . .
>There is a difference between Stalinist Communism and International GloboHomo (((Marxism)))
Explain the difference, gommrade.
What is the underlying world view of Gommunism?
Opposing degeneracy such as you indicate was hardly unusual for those times. WHY does stalin oppose them? Is it for generic reasons or is there something specific to gommunizm or stanizm that is more specifically opposed to it?

GIVE US SOME ANSWERS, GOMMERADE
>>5315
Spot on. It's not a coincidence that the most dead serious White Nationalists -- guys like Yockey, Carto, Pierce -- all clued in on that.
>>5318
> most dead serious White Nationalists -- guys like Yockey, Carto, Pierce
Not Rockwell, Mason, Jordan? Were these people not deadly serious, gommrade?
Its weird how a board with a pretty low pop suddenly gets all these gommunists in such a short time? And all in the same bread too.
>>5321
Rockwell for a long time was hung up on the same dumb shit you were. Believing the USSR was the center of world jewry.
>>5323
And before israel it was.
And they still had their claws in Russia.
Still do.
>>5308
>You mean the jews, gommrade.
No, ZOG-faggot. I mean the Zionists, most of whom in the ZOG are Christfaggots. There are millions and millions of Christfaggot servants in the ZOG, who would turn every white male into a faggot, and marry every white female to a nigger, if they thought it would help the Kikes. They do it because they live in a fantasy world, where doing such things earns them brownie points with the imaginary Sky-Kike.
>Its like you’re using the term zog without any understanding of the jews or something? Odd.
In fact, the exact opposite is the case. ZOG is an acronym for Zionist Occupation Government. Notice the word Zionist. It's not the KOG, or the JOG, but the ZOG. Dylann Storm Roof once wrote that if Kikes had blue skin, there wouldn't even be a Jewish Question. And he was 100% correct. The Ashkenazi (Euro) Kike has been able to do to the White Nation what it has done because they are 'white enough' to get away with being viewed by most as part of the in-group, when they view themselves as part of an out-group minority.
If they Kikes had no Christfaggot servants in "America," the ZOG wouldn't exist.
>Doesn’t answer the question, gommrade. It evades it.
The ZOG-faggot didn't ask a question. It just spewed some gibberish about being "racially aware" and then pretends like this was a question.
>But niggers are another Nation to white Americans.
The USSR would agree with you, but the ZOG wouldn't. Can you figure out why this is, ZOG-faggot?
>Because Nation is a thing of blood.
Two different languages = two different Nations, and Nations don't cross the racial-barrier (the "blood" thing part).
>Citation needed.
Scroll up, ZOG-faggot.
>All of this is pilpul, btw.
The ZOG-faggot simply can't handle the truth that the vast majority of people who ever called themselves "communists" were motivated by Nationalism. It simply isn't allowed to be thought by ZOG-faggots, because they would realize that thing called "America" (which they love so much), has been at war with Nationalism for decades and decades now. In fact, it still is.
>Thats fine and all, but its not a world view.
You don't need a "world view" to oppose people fucking animals. Morever, there is no "world view" that has any well-developed line on degeneracy. The Bible, for instance, has even less well-developed attacks on homosexuality than what can in Marx and Engels. Christfaggotry as a historical institution doesn't even have any well-developed opposition to homosexuality.
>No.
ZOG-faggots are also the world's biggest liars, and simply won't admit anything. They have to be forcefully exposed, but putting forth ideological propositions that expose them. Like this one:
The line separating English-speaking Europeans in that thing called "Canada" and that thing called "America" is an imaginary line, separating the single English-speaking European Nation. Just like the line separating Germany and that thing called "Austria" is an imaginary line, separating the single German-speaking European Nation.
>>5321
>and before israel
Nope.
>And they still had their claws in Russia.
They were literally getting rounded up and executed.
>Still do.
After the Western/jewish economic hit job under Yeltsin.

Ultimately, you can't accept that the "right wing" [for lack of a better term] in the Soviet Union WON and the "right wing" in the West is a sad sack bunch of nigger lovers who dismantled their country's industry to bribe slants and slopes away from the reds. That's the truth. It's the reality you live in every day when you drive to the store. It's the reality you live when you look at your grandkids, nigger lover.
>>5321
>Mason
If you actually read Siege, Mason makes several remarks about "communism" that shows his thinking was more in line with Yockey than Rockwell. For instance, he actually discusses once going to a meeting setup by the RCP (Revolutionary Communist Party) about a strike at a factory somewhere, and actually sitting down and giving them advice.
In another place, he (correctly) points out we have nothing to fear from communists, because they can only target us if we give them a target, unlike the ZOG. Moreover, he also says in another place that if communists are attacking the government, that this is a good thing, and White Nationalists (in such a situation) should wait until the dust has settled before striking at them (by this, he meant internal communists, not external ones).
>5326
>You mean the jews, gommrade.
>No, ZOG-faggot. I mean the Zionists, most of whom in the ZOG are Christfaggots.
>Doesnt know the difference between useful idiots and jews.

>Its like you’re using the term zog without any understanding of the jews or something? Odd.
>In fact, the exact opposite is the case. ZOG is an acronym for Zionist Occupation Government. Notice the word Zionist.
And then immediately contradicts himself.
>Doesn’t answer the question, gommrade. It evades it.
>The ZOG-faggot didn't ask a question. It just spewed some gibberish about being "racially aware" and then pretends like this was a question.
kek.
>But niggers are another Nation to white Americans.
>The USSR would agree with you, but the ZOG wouldn't. Can you figure out why this is, ZOG-faggot?
Because youre trying to pilpul?
>Because Nation is a thing of blood.
>Two different languages = two different Nations, and Nations don't cross the racial-barrier (the "blood" thing part).
So niggers are a different Nation. . .
>Citation needed.
>Scroll up, ZOG-faggot.
Where to?
>All of this is pilpul, btw.
>The ZOG-faggot simply can't handle the truth that the vast majority of people who ever called themselves "communists" were motivated by Nationalism.
You mean they were lied too? Yeah, thats pretty obvious.
>Thats fine and all, but its not a world view.
>You don't need a "world view" to oppose people fucking animals.
So you admit that you have no specific worldview that opposes degeneracy?
>Morever, there is no "world view" that has any well-developed line on degeneracy.
Confirmed admission.
And as a matter of fact their is. Its called National Socialism. We have a thread about that, btw.
>No.
>ZOG-faggots are also the world's biggest liars, and simply won't admit anything.
So you’re a zog faggot?
>The line separating English-speaking Europeans in that thing called "Canada" and that thing called "America" is an imaginary line, separating the single English-speaking European Nation. Just like the line separating Germany and that thing called "Austria" is an imaginary line, separating the single German-speaking European Nation.
But what about German colonists in America?
>>5326
Pour Vous >>5329
>>5327
But im not aligned with any of those wings, gommrade.
Im a National Socialist.
>>5328
Implying that Mason was a marxist 'fellow traveller'. When he was just prioritizing targets.
And you still haven’t answered my perfectly reasonable questions . . .
>There is a difference between Stalinist Communism and International GloboHomo (((Marxism)))
Explain the difference, gommrade.
What is the underlying world view of Gommunism?
Opposing degeneracy such as you indicate was hardly unusual for those times. WHY does stalin oppose them? Is it for generic reasons or is there something specific to gommunizm or stanizm that is more specifically opposed to it?

GIVE US SOME ANSWERS, GOMMERADE

Still waiting . . .
>>5329
>Doesnt know the difference between useful idiots and jews.
This is the ZOG-faggot making excuses for traitors. The Christfaggots who actually rule (on behalf of the Kikes) are "useful idiots" and helpless dupes. This is a lie. The vast, vast majority of Kike-cock suckers in that thing called "America" are die-hard Christfaggots, who could never be convinced not to support Kikes. They will have to be killed, along with the Kikes.
>And then immediately contradicts himself.
The ZOG-faggot accuses me of contradicting myself, but seems unable to explain why it is the Zionist Occupation Government, and not the Kike Occupation Government.
>Because youre trying to pilpul?
The ZOG-faggot will spew gibberish and then act like it was a question, but won't answer questions put to it.
"Why did the ZOG hate the USSR so much?" - for a ZOG-faggot to even attempt to answer this question causes them to ideological discomfort. For one, it means they have to pretend to believe anything they are claiming to believe, and trying to make logical connections. It means having to confront the ideological conditioning of the 'Right' wing of the ZOG, in a way they are never used to doing. They simply can't handle it.
But this isn't hard for someone not a ZOG-lover. The ZOG thinks niggers are part of the same "Nation" as the everyone else in "America." That's because they don't even believe in the existence of Nations. "Nation" is not a legitimate category that people can be put into. For the ZOG, there are no Nations, only countries.
The ZOG can not accept the existence of Nations because to do so would immediately give it an existential crisis. "America" was founded on anti-nationalism. There never was a "Revolutionary War." It was a British Civil War that the rebels won, and the rebels were a bunch of crooks and religious cranks.
>So niggers are a different Nation. . .
No shit they are a different Nation. Just like the USSR said they were.
>You mean they were lied too? Yeah, thats pretty obvious.
Now the ZOG-faggot can't even respond coherently.
>So you admit that you have no specific worldview that opposes degeneracy?
No, you fucking idiotic liar. I said "world views" of communism and Christfaggotry both have relatively undeveloped opposition toward degeneracy. That is, communist-ruled countries have been generally anti-faggot, but without anything like a well-developed body of literature opposing faggotry to point to. The same situation exists for everyone. The National Socialist German Worker's Party didn't have any well-developed thesis on faggots either, and had many open faggots in its ranks (Rohm), but will you see this ZOG-faggot making a point about it in some future thread? Of course not.
As far as myself goes, my opposition to faggotry comes from my own reading about the phenomenon, and I most certainly do believe I have a more well-developed line against faggotry than most. If you want to read the "Left" version of the Globohomo idea, I recommend getting ahold of the work of Jasbir Puar. If you can stomach the post-modernism and academic jargon, you will see quite a profound critique of the faggot identity.
>>5329
>Confirmed admission.
Admission to ignorance of any well-developed thesis against faggotry, yes. Oh, and "well-developed" doesn't mean "there are a handful of verses saying faggots should die in the Bible." One couldn't expect the Ancient world to have ever developed such thing, simply because the homosexual identity didn't exist back then. But feel free to educate me on the most well-developed anti-faggot stuff you can find.
>And as a matter of fact their is. Its called National Socialism. We have a thread about that, btw.
There is no well-developed opposition to faggotry in any of the works created (or endorsed) by the National Socialist German Workers' Party. If there was, Rohm would have never got to the position he had in the organization. Nor did they develop anything after killing him either.
Also, the most well-developed Christfaggot attacks on faggotry basically revolve around pinning faggotry on the NDSAP. See the Pink Swatiska as an example of this literature. Christfaggots literally can't even think of anything worse to say about faggots than "They're Nazis!"
>So you’re a zog faggot?
Again, ZOG-faggots will never admit to what they are. The only way to expose them is ideologically.
>But what about German colonists in America?
And so the ZOG-faggot exposes itself.
If you don't speak German, you aren't part of the German Nation, period. If you were adopted in Germany by English-speaking parents and moved to that thing called "America," you real Nation is the English-speaking European Nation (aka the White Nation).
This should be obvious to anyone even vaguely claiming to be a Nationalist, but the fact that this ZOG-faggot thinks they have asked some sort of 'gotcha' question shows they don't even believe in the existence of Nations, much less are they actually Nationalists.
>>5328
>Mason was a ZOG-loving retard like myself, who built his identity out of opposing gommunism like Jesus told me to do
Read Siege, ZOG-faggot.
>>5326
>Morever, there is no "world view" that has any well-developed line on degeneracy.
Would that include Stalinism?
Because if so that makes op's meme attempts into lies.
>>5339
>I hate the USSR because they locked up faggots in mental institutions, and they didn't even need the Bible to be able to tell them to do it
Kill yourself, ZOG-faggot.
>>5342
>i win! ZOG give me some money now
Note how my phrase "well-developed" is replaced with his own, "specific opposition."
The USSR made many "specific oppositions" against homosexuality throughout its existence. The Christfaggots that wrote the Pink Swastika are an example I give of a "well-developed" case, which essentially amounts to saying "Nazis are faggots!" or "Faggots are Nazis!" essentially piggy-backing on common ZOG narratives about WW2. There are quite a number of problems with the thesis, but this was an example I gave of something being "well-developed," meaning that someone could seriously argue this stuff and believe it. It's built on-top of ZOG narratives about itself that would be fairly compelling to most normalfags, which is the intended audience.
I know of no such extended literary critiques like this from the USSR (or the NSDAP, for that matter). The USSR (and the NSDAP) made many different specific forms of opposition to it, however. The USSR considered it a mental illness, and it was a a punishable criminal offensive. There are many stories of "oppressed" faggots in the USSR. The literature on how much the USSR attacked faggots is quite extensive, and a simple google search will be enough to expose anyone to it.
Like the authors of The Pink Swastika, the USSR did the samething in their press; they equated the NSDAP with homosexuality. Fascism, to them, is literally the political expression of the most degenerate sorts of faggots. In developing this position, they obviously had in mind Rohm.
However, these remarks are often stated in speeches, or printed in newspaper articles. There doesn't appear to have been anything like The Pink Swastika people would point to, in support of it as a "well-developed" defense of their viewpoint.
That there is nothing similar in the case of the Nazi Socialist German Workers' Party either (at least that I am aware of, feel free to correct me if I am mistaken) shouldn't bother anyone. Only in the modern era, with the fullest emrbace of faggotry by the ZOG (both by the "Left" and the 'Right' wings of it), does this serve any sort of ideological importance.
Moreover, revolutionary White Nationalists don't need any of this nonsense. We will simply stamp it out after the White Nation Liberation War. It is already possible to detect would-be homosexuals in elementary school. These children would be studied, and subjected to psychological experimentation to prevent their development into a faggot.
This is already possible, there simply isn't any political will to do it. This isn't going to be the case for the post-revolution White Nation-State. The faggot-identity has no future, just like that thing called "America," which created it in the first place.
Opposing faggotry isn't a theological question for us. We aren't Christfaggots, afraid of what the Sky-Kike might do to use for not being his bride (read the Song of Songs, Christfags). Opposing faggotry is a National Question, at least in our context. To oppose faggotry is to oppose the corruption of the youth of our Nation, to oppose Zionists recruitment of degenerates into their ranks who will remain forever loyal to them.
>>5346
Nope.
If you don’t have a specific world view based opposition to degeneracy then your original maymays may as well have been based on scientology, ffs. You are just posturing while attempting to piggy back your commie filth onto the zeitgeist because you think anons will fall for it. and failing
National Socialism on the other hand IS inherently opposed to degeneracy.
I WIN!
>>5341
>Natural Law, the basis of National Socialism.
'Right' wing ZOG-faggots think the National Socialism is just a fashion accessory to the stupid shit the ZOG already pumped in their minds.
>Himmler thinks you’re a commie faggot.
Himmler knows you're a nigger lover that worships Kikes.
>What was the pink Triangle?
Certainly not a "well-developed" thesis anyone could point to, ZOG-faggot.
>i love kikes and niggers
We know you do.
>But what about genetic clusters within the white meta race, gommrade?
This is the ZOG-faggot mocking the common understanding the masses of the White Nation have. The ZOG-faggot is admitting they don't believe in the existence of Nations, while trying to locate being anything at all is associated with a set of alleles. They also think faggots are like this.
>>5348
>If you don’t have a specific world view based opposition to degeneracy then your original maymays may as well have been based on scientology, ffs.
It lies about being a Christfaggot, but it reasons just like one.
>You are just posturing while attempting to piggy back your commie filth onto the zeitgeist because you think anons will fall for it.
The ZOG told the masses of the White Nation that "communism" meant forced integration with niggers. Then the ZOG did it anyway, and told everyone it proved they weren't "collectivists."
It isn't going to happen again. This was predicted by William Luther Pierce in the Turner Diaries. The ZOG-faggots will screech "communism" all the way to end. To quote the Turner Diaries:

>Revolutionary Command made the strictly practical decision to let General Harding carry the ball in his area, and our people were instructed not to oppose him. This had the effect of substantially reducing our own losses, although the military has actually suffered many more casualties in northern California than in the south. This is because Harding has failed to take sufficiently radical measures to consolidate his authority and to deal with Black military personnel.
>When a delegation of Organization people went to Harding last month and suggested a joint Organization-military rule for northern California, with Harding’s forces handling defense matters and the Organization handling civilian matters—including police functions— Harding arrested them and has refused to release them. Since then he has been issuing idiotic proclamations about “restoring the Constitution,” stamping out “communism and pornography,” and holding new elections to “re-establish the republican form of government intended by the Founding Fathers,” whatever that means.
>And he has denounced our radical measures in the south as “communism.” He is appalled that we didn’t hold some sort of public referendum before expelling the non-Whites and that we didn’t give individual trials to the Jews and race-criminals we dealt with summarily. Doesn’t the old fool understand that the American people voted themselves into the mess they’re in now? Doesn’t he understand that the Jews have taken over the country fair and square, according to the Constitution? Doesn’t he understand that the common people have already had their fling at self-government, and they blew it?"

When the White Nation Liberation War is here, we will make short work of this nonsense. We will simply say this: "If forced integration with niggers and slavery to Kikes is communism, they are the communism. If having a real Nation-State is communism, then we are the "communists."
(335.66 KB 800x554 marx.png)
>>5349
You know shit, gommrade.
Oh, and did i mention? I WIN!

On the plus side you did answer this question, albeit inadvertently:
Opposing degeneracy such as you indicate was hardly unusual for those times. WHY does stalin oppose them? Is it for generic reasons or is there something specific to gommunizm or stanizm that is more specifically opposed to it?
>>5326
>there is no "world view" that has any well-developed line on degeneracy.
Thus admitting that stanizm doesn’t inherently oppose buttsex.
I WIN!

But you still haven’t answered my other perfectly reasonable questions . . .
>There is a difference between Stalinist Communism and International GloboHomo (((Marxism)))
Explain the difference, gommrade.
What is the underlying world view of Gommunism?

GIVE US SOME MORE ANSWERS, GOMMERADE
>>5350
Same id lol
>>5350
But you ARE a gommunizt, you fucking prick.
(48.62 KB 577x608 gfhnmnm.jpeg)
And with that the commie faggot killed himself with his own dilator and absolutely no one was sad.
/thread.
>>4514
>ZOG kikes hated the USSR
wrong, 95+% of the communist leadership was jewish.
>ZOG-boomers
ZOG != boomers. ZOG is the enemy. "Boomers" are our own older people.
<daily reminder that the boomer meme is the kike's d&c tactic
>>4637
>"christcuck"
another d&c tactic. Moshe's excited to see infighting.
Keep your eye on the true enemy, kikes and niggers.
(2.41 MB 640x360 torah talmud.mp4)
This thread, lol.
(141.69 KB 531x1864 Stalin Purim.png)
>>5382
Stalin was originally backed by jewry (obviously), but with things like the murder of Trotsky and the Doctor's Plot, they split.

The "anti-communist" movement - many of the talking points of which are sadly making a comeback - was never about actually opposing communism. They were all Trotskyites opposing the "wrong" kind of communism. Even McCarthy fell into that agenda, thanks to Trump's mentor, the boy-trafficking kike, Ropy Cohn.
>>5485
>gommunizm has never been tried!
Which is why these questions were asked, gommrade.
On the plus side you did answer this question, albeit inadvertently:
Opposing degeneracy such as you indicate was hardly unusual for those times. WHY does stalin oppose them? Is it for generic reasons or is there something specific to gommunizm or stanizm that is more specifically opposed to it?
>>5326
>there is no "world view" that has any well-developed line on degeneracy.
Thus admitting that stanizm doesn’t inherently oppose buttsex.
I WIN!

But you still haven’t answered my other perfectly reasonable questions . . .
>There is a difference between Stalinist Communism and International GloboHomo (((Marxism)))
Explain the difference, gommrade.
What is the underlying world view of Gommunism?

GIVE US SOME MORE ANSWERS, GOMMERADE
>>5216
>"Cultural Marxism" is a term invented by a ZOG-loving faggot to pretend the things he doesn't like about "America" are the result of a people 'Marxists' controlling the cultural institutions of "America" (you know, schools and the TV). This is not an exaggeration at all; just google William Lind to see what a Kike-lover he is.

You see, the marxist is incapable of honesty because its all 'dialectic'.
So the fucking marxist faggot deliberately tries to change the script here.
Replacing the issue of the phenomena of cultural marxism and the frankfurt school that was being refereed to and replacing it with the development of the term 'cultural marxism' itself.
Pilpul 101.
>>5534
>The amount of politically active people inside the borders of "America" that would self-identify as a "Marxist" (of any sort) is vanishingly small, maybe 10,000 people, maximum. They don't control "America," they are a fringe element of the Democratic "Party," largely floating around the ZOG's labor bureaucracy. These people are politically insignificant, and incapable of controlling the cultural of the ZOG, which is run mostly by Kikes and the government itself (through the identify-implanting compounds they refer to as schools).
So how do you explain the uncanny resemblance between cultural marxist aims an ideas and the visible effects imposed upon our society? Why do they match so perfectly? Its uncanny . . . Or is it a cohencidence, gommrade?
Also, if you are going to use the term zog maybe you should understand what that means? because a small, nepotistic, fanatical group is exactly what zog refers to - they may have many, many collaborators but the zog itself is quite small.
You really have no idea do you?
>>5542
>William Luther Pierce
But Pierce hated gommunizm so your statement is retarded.
>screeching "communism"
But you ARE a gommunizt, fuckwhit.
>by sheer magic.
No, by jews. You really don’t get it do you? Screeching zog wont change that, gommrade.
>I am a White Nationalist,
Said the gommunizt that thinks Nation is just a shared language.
You don’t even know what Nation is, gommrade.

Oh and btw I WIN!

On the plus side you did answer this question, albeit inadvertently:
Opposing degeneracy such as you indicate was hardly unusual for those times. WHY does stalin oppose them? Is it for generic reasons or is there something specific to gommunizm or stanizm that is more specifically opposed to it?
>>5326
>there is no "world view" that has any well-developed line on degeneracy.
Thus admitting that stanizm doesn’t inherently oppose buttsex.
I WIN!

But you still haven’t answered my other perfectly reasonable questions . . .
>There is a difference between Stalinist Communism and International GloboHomo (((Marxism)))
Explain the difference, gommrade.
What is the underlying world view of Gommunism?

GIVE US SOME MORE ANSWERS, GOMMERADE
>>5543
>But Pierce hated gommunizm so your statement is retarded.
Pierce made many remarks about the USSR, but he didn't write a book about White Nationalists attacking the USSR. He made one about them attacking the ZOG, retard.
>But you ARE a gommunizt, fuckwhit.
You're a ZOG-lover, faggot.
>No, by jews.
Notice what he is saying. Kikes gave "Marxists" the power to control "America" cultural. How did the Kikes do this? Did they hire them out as directors and producers in Hollywood? lol
>You really don’t get it do you?
I know exactly what you are, Kike-lover. The point is to help other people realize it to.
>Screeching zog wont change that
We know you hate the term ZOG. It's too concise, too accurate, leaving no wiggle room for Kikes and their servants to escape. Quite unlike "Cultural Marxism," in fact.
>Said the gommunizt that thinks Nation is just a shared language.
This ZOG-faggot doesn't even believe in the existence of Nations. They think English-speaking Europeans in "America" and "Canada" belong to two different Nations!
(65.45 KB 1035x416 Cultural Marxism 101.png)
>>5547
>"Cultural Marxism" isn't even a coherent set of ideas
Cultural Marxism, like all forms of maxizm is retarded but that doesn’t mean that its impossible to explain it. I already did, gommrade.
Pic realted is good enough plus vid here: >>5163
Neither are perfect but both get it.
For a maxizt that claims to oppose cultural maxizm your awfully coy about it. Odd.
>but if they were correct
I am.
You have no understanding of the jew in spite of your constant parroting of the terms zog, kike etc... sad.
>>5551
Avoidance and pilpul.
(76.76 KB 1022x336 Jewish HIV.png)
>>5548
>But Pierce hated gommunizm so your statement is retarded.
>Pierce made many remarks about the USSR, but he didn't write a book about White Nationalists attacking the USSR. He made one about them attacking the ZOG, retard.
Implying that he didnt hate the soviets, retard.
>But you ARE a gommunizt, fuckwhit.
>You're a ZOG-lover, faggot.
You have done nothing but shill stanizt gommunizm you enthusiastic fondler of stans balls. lol.
>No, by jews.
>Notice what he is saying. Kikes gave "Marxists" the power to control "America" cultural. How did the Kikes do this? Did they hire them out as directors and producers in Hollywood? lol
So you really dont know the jew at all do you?
The jew isnt maxizt, communizt, stanizt, capitalist or any other ist. The jew is just the jew. Aka the racial, National, cultural & philosophical equivalent of HIV. Pic related.
Cultural Marxism is just one of their new tools.
>You really don’t get it do you?
>I know exactly what you are, Kike-lover. The point is to help other people realize it to.
I guess anons can read this bread and make their own minds up . . .
>Screeching zog wont change that
>We know you hate the term ZOG. It's too concise, too accurate, leaving no wiggle room for Kikes and their servants to escape. Quite unlike "Cultural Marxism," in fact.
I don’t hate the term zog, its just you don’t really know what it means, gommrade.
>Said the gommunizt that thinks Nation is just a shared language.
>This ZOG-faggot doesn't even believe in the existence of Nations. They think English-speaking Europeans in "America" and "Canada" belong to two different Nations!
Nation is a thing of blood. But blood can diverge. The Canadians etc... are no longer English, Scottish, Irish etc... they ARE closely related, but they have branched. Simple.
Doo U neeed uh blankie, gommrade?
Oh and btw . . .

On the plus side you did answer this question, albeit inadvertently:
Opposing degeneracy such as you indicate was hardly unusual for those times. WHY does stalin oppose them? Is it for generic reasons or is there something specific to gommunizm or stanizm that is more specifically opposed to it?
>>5326
>there is no "world view" that has any well-developed line on degeneracy.
Thus admitting that stanizm doesn’t inherently oppose buttsex.
I WIN!

But you still haven’t answered my other perfectly reasonable questions . . .
>There is a difference between Stalinist Communism and International GloboHomo (((Marxism)))
Explain the difference, gommrade.
What is the underlying world view of Gommunism?

GIVE US SOME MORE ANSWERS, GOMMERADE
>>5554
>Implying that he didnt hate the soviets, retard.
Note to the reader: this exchange started with this ZOG-faggot saying Pierce is a retard for predicting that the ZOG will screech "communism" to end.
>You have done nothing but shill stanizt gommunizm you enthusiastic fondler of stans balls. lol.
Not regurgitating ZOO-narrative-scripts is "shilling for communism." Cold War was fake, political theater cooked up in Hollywood. Nasrallah is a crisis actor.
>jew is hiv
The Kike identity has been picked up by various populations throughout history, from the ancient Khazars to those niggers you sometimes see on street corners calling themselves Black Hebrew Israelites. People like Ivanka Trump will throw off whatever identity they previously had and start LARPing around as Kikes, because why the fuck not pretend you're one of God's Chosen People?
>Cultural Marxism is just one of their new tools.
Is this "tool", in your retarded mind, more or less effective than say, Hollywood, and the ZOG-funded education system?
>I don’t hate the term zog, its just you don’t really know what it means
"America" was born bad. "America" was created by anti-nationalist separatists, who thoight "Liberty" meant the "liberty" to pretend Nations aren't real.
The Founding Nigger Fuckers of "America" were people who largely believed it was their god-given right to make you live beside as many niggers as they could afford to buy.
They setup a system that, when the Kikes starting mass migrating here, were easily able to take over. Moreover, they literally created Hollywood and the film industry. More Kikes live in that thing called "America" than Hollywood. We are to the Kikes what the Han were to the Manchu: slaves.
>Nation is a thing of blood. But blood can diverge. The Canadians etc... are no longer English, Scottish, Irish etc... they ARE closely related, but they have branched. Simple.
Again, the ZOG-faggot exposes itself. They don't believe in the existence of Nations, period. That is the very hidden foundation of "American" politics; to keep pretending like an identity that they made up to separate themselves from their real Nation is legitimate. It isn't.
And the people who taught the entire planet this lesson, most dramatically, were none other than the National Socialist German Workers' Party.
The same people calling themselves "National Socialists" on this forum will also be telling you German and that thing called "Austria" are two different Nations!
Yes, the situation that existed for the real German Nation exists for the English-speaking European Nation. The line separating that thing called "Austria" from Germany is an imaginary line, separating the single German-speaking European Nation. Just like the line separating North (Uncircumcised) Korea from South (Circumcised) Korea is an imaginary. Just like Bulgaria and that thing called "North Macedonia."
This should be an obvious principle of Nationalism Socialism, no, instead, people get feed bullshit Q&As about "National Socialism" being about "Natural Law," when they just spew conscious lies about what their real Nation even is!
That's how much they'll lie. They will never stop. They will willingly and diligently serve the Kikes to the end.
>>5565
>Implying that he didnt hate the soviets, retard.
>Note to the reader: this exchange started with this ZOG-faggot saying Pierce is a retard for predicting that the ZOG will screech "communism" to end.
Citation needed, gommrade . . .
>You have done nothing but shill stanizt gommunizm you enthusiastic fondler of stans balls. lol.
>Not regurgitating ZOO-narrative-scripts is "shilling for communism." Cold War was fake, political theater cooked up in Hollywood. Nasrallah is a crisis actor.
What a spastic.
>jew is hiv
>The Kike identity has been picked up by various populations throughout history, from the ancient Khazars to those niggers you sometimes see on street corners calling themselves Black Hebrew Israelites. People like Ivanka Trump will throw off whatever identity they previously had and start LARPing around as Kikes, because why the fuck not pretend you're one of God's Chosen People?
>But wat iz uh joo tho?
Poor effort, would work on reddit. 3/10.
>Cultural Marxism is just one of their new tools.
>Is this "tool", in your retarded mind, more or less effective than say, Hollywood, and the ZOG-funded education system?
How do you think the jew spreads cultural marxist ideas, gommrade?
>"America" was born bad etc. . .
>The Founding Nigger Fuckers of "America" etc. . .
America isn’t a piece of paper, an idea, a language or a system of government.
America is the blood of the NW European -predominantly the British isles - men and women that carved itself out of the wilderness and over many bodies.
But then you wouldn’t know that would you gommrade . . .
>Nation is a thing of blood. But blood can diverge. The Canadians etc... are no longer English, Scottish, Irish etc... they ARE closely related, but they have branched. Simple.
>Again, the ZOG-faggot exposes itself. They don't believe in the existence of Nations, period. That is the very hidden foundation of "American" politics; to keep pretending like an identity that they made up to separate themselves from their real Nation is legitimate. It isn't.
This is a non sequitor, gommrade. Are you taking your meds?
>The same people calling themselves "National Socialists" on this forum will also be telling you German and that thing called "Austria" are two different Nations!
Citation needed, gommrade . . .
>Yes, the situation that existed for the real German Nation exists for the English-speaking European Nation. The line separating that thing called "Austria" from Germany is an imaginary line, separating the single German-speaking European Nation. Just like the line separating North (Uncircumcised) Korea from South (Circumcised) Korea is an imaginary. Just like Bulgaria and that thing called "North Macedonia."
>This should be an obvious principle of Nationalism Socialism, no, instead, people get feed bullshit Q&As about "National Socialism" being about "Natural Law,"
But Natural Law IS the basis of National Socialism. Its quite straight forward.
But then you wouldn’t know that because, again, you are a gommunizt. SAd.
>when they just spew conscious lies about what their real Nation even is!
Citation needed, gommrade . . .
>That's how much they'll lie. They will never stop. They will willingly and diligently serve the Kikes to the end.
I don’t think you have any idea how retarded you really are?
You seem upset, gommrade?
(158.62 KB 376x509 Lol.jpg)
Since gommrade buttplug is having trouble ill explain what Nation is and how it can diverge.
*ahem*
Nation is neither government nor the state, Nation is a thing of Blood.
It is from our shared ancestral lineage that our collective biology, temperament, history &
culture arises. Over the generations our Nation functions like a super organism, struggling,
growing, sickening & weakening, strengthening & recovering or dying.
Evolving through time & struggle our Blood has always successfully passed down through
the generations in an unbroken pedigree reaching back millennia. Like a great river, our
Nation flows generation upon generation from the past we inherit from our parents &
people, through us, the living embodiment of our Nation in the present & from us to our
children & the future that we bequeath to them.
Our Blood belongs to our people & we have a duty to pass on this sacred Blood unpolluted
to our children.
Our Blood is our Nation, culture is its memory, we are its living manifestation & it lives or
dies through us.
If our Nation becomes weak & degenerate or forgets what it is by falling prey to clever
rhetoric, propaganda or petty materialism it will die, first psychologically then physically.

Thats all pretty obvious. But what about colonies? Since America, Canada, Straya, and New Zealand for instance are mostly derived from the stock of the British isles doesn’t that mean that they are the same Nation?
Well yes and no. Biologically they are very much of the same blood but some modest differences have developed. Language & cultural variations most obviously. This divergence isn’t so great as to form a completely separate Blood Nation atm and nothing that for example a strayan of English blood cant overcome with a little time spent in England for instance. But it is a distinction. This can be likened to a family that stems from the same parents. Distinct siblings yet all closely related.
A family of brother Nations if you will.
Pic related.
This process is the National equivalent of speciation where a group is geographically separated from the main body of its species and begins to slowly develop its own distinct but still related characteristics.
This is quite simple and easily grasped by National Socialists.
Even many normies can get it with a little encouragement.
But it seems beyond the capacity of a gommunist to get his pointy little head around?
I am disappoint, gommrade.
(324.97 KB 759x1162 commie_kitty.jpg)
>>5682
One thing you notice about the "anti-communists" in the ZOG territories is how vile and hatefilled they are towards White people who lived in the USSR and how glad they were that they suffered in the jewish mafia takedown of their country. It's very different from the tone taken by genuinely Good, White Men like Dr. Pierce who lament the manufactured hostilities between our people.
>>5795
>A tool you just admitted exists.
By "admit exists," do you mean I "admit" it is a concept in the heads of some retarded people? Like how the SkyKike exists if you just believe hard enough in it?
>Why so reluctant to acknowledge this one and name it?
Because it was invented by ZOG-loving Kikes to conceal the role of Kikes in the production of what the ZOG calls culture. You know, people who would be very offended if you dare to say "Cultural Marxism" caused forced integration with niggers on the White Nation.
Seriously. The phrase was popularized by a man named William Lind. Just google him. Old, dying ZOG-Boomer phrases, trying to be forced into the chans.
>Citation needed, gommrade . . .
Scroll up to your previous posts, ZOG-faggot.
>More citation needed, gommrade...
The ZOG-faggot thinks "Americans" and "Australians" are different by "Blood." Something in the "Blood" makes you an "American." Something different happens, in the "Blood," (read: species, race, ethnic group, even, apparently, Nations!) to make you a "Canadian." And so on and so forth. Now doubt this ZOG-faggot could find a set of alleles, separating two people from different states of the Alabama state line. Do we have "Alabama" and "Florida" "Blood" too? No doubt Engelbert Dolfuss would be interested to hear your remarks, but any thinking person should have already come to the correct conclusion about this anon/bot about a dozen posts ago.
>>5800
>By "admit exists," do you mean I "admit" it is a concept in the heads of some retarded people?
Yes. And those people are called cultural marxists and their jew masters. Thank you for agreeing.
>Because it was invented by ZOG-loving Kikes
So you admit it exists and was invented by kikes? Good.
>people who would be very offended if you dare to say "Cultural Marxism"
Like you?
>caused forced integration with niggers on the White Nation.
So you then? I mean you are a gommunist.
>The phrase . . .
But the phrase describes an actual phenomena invented by the kikes of the frankfurt school.
Why are you trying to bait and switch, gommrade? Especially when you just admitted it exists?
>Scroll up to your previous posts, ZOG-faggot.
>The ZOG-faggot thinks "Americans" and "Australians" are different by "Blood."
You mean this? >>5667
I guess anons can read it and draw whatever conclusions they thing correct, gommrade.
How is this working out, gommrade?
As planned?
Because if you’re plan was to come across as anything other than pic related then you’re an idiot.
(13.69 KB 285x214 gfhnm.jpeg)
>be gommiefag
>find small /pol/ splinter
>'These anons are Nationalists or something, right?'
>NowIsMyChanceToShine.jpg
>Make bread to lure newfags into Stalinist rimjobs
>'Stan was just a nationalist who hated faggots!'
>Be completely unable to explain or elaborate in any way when asked repeatedly.
>Screech ZOG because 'idk, jews or something?'
>bread is a fail
>an hero
mfw.

On the plus side you did answer this question, albeit inadvertently:
Opposing degeneracy such as you indicate was hardly unusual for those times. WHY does stalin oppose them? Is it for generic reasons or is there something specific to gommunizm or stanizm that is more specifically opposed to it?
>>5326
>there is no "world view" that has any well-developed line on degeneracy.
Thus admitting that stanizm doesn’t inherently oppose buttsex.
I WIN!

But you still haven’t answered my other perfectly reasonable questions . . .
>There is a difference between Stalinist Communism and International GloboHomo (((Marxism)))
Explain the difference, gommrade.
What is the underlying world view of Gommunism?

GIVE US SOME MORE ANSWERS, GOMMERADE
>>5935
i like to welcome new traffic but yeah we need to keep a close eye on commies due to most of them shitting up other chans
ill let it slide as long as theres no kikery going down
report any and all D&C, kikery, shilling and faggotry
(reminder that if the report captcha expire you can reload the page as a temporary fix)
Edited last time by blackjack on 09/25/2019 (Wed) 21:12:52.
>>5667
>ill explain what Nation is and how it can diverge.
The "Austrofascist" government of Engelbert Dollfuss also would spew similar nonsense to try to pretend they belonged to a different Nation than Germany. No one believed them in the end either.
>Nation is neither government nor the state, Nation is a thing of Blood.
Engelbert Dollfuss here is telling you Nations aren't real. "A thing of Blood" is a phrase used to substitute race for Nation, because all ZOG-faggots think Ashkenazi (Euro) Kikes in Israel are part of their "Blood Nation." The ZOG-faggot doesn't identify with his real Nation, but with some imaginary thing called "Western Civilization," beginning with Kike mythological history. Just like the ZOG taught them to do in those things they call schools.
>It is from our shared ancestral lineage that our collective biology
This is the ZOG-faggot trying to get the reader to understand their Nation as ancient Romans, Greeks, and Kikes.
>Over the generations our Nation functions like a super organism
The ZOG-faggot simultaneously wants you to believe ancient Romans, Greeks and Kikes are part of your "Blood Nation," but wants you to think English-speaking European "Canadians" belong to a totally different "super organism." Engelbert Dollfuss doesn't care about the contradictions involved in this, because he himself doesn't even believe it. He just thinks white people will believe any stupid shit he pulls out of his ass.
>Evolving through time & struggle our Blood has always successfully passed down through
the generations in an unbroken pedigree reaching back millennia
Again, English-speaking European "Canadians" belong to a different Nation, but somehow our "Blood Nation" goes back "millennia" (read: ancient Greeks, Romans and Kikes). Again, Engelbert Dollfuss doesn't care what he is writing, and thinks the reader will believe anything. His imaginary audience is filled with people he thinks will believe anything, no matter how self-contradictory it is. He hates white people, and has no qualms pushing the crudest and stupidest of lies to them.
>>5667
>Like a great river, our
>Nation flows generation upon generation from the past
Again, English-speaking European "Canadians" belong to a different Nation, while simultaneously our Nation goes all the way back to ancient Greeks, Romans, and Kikes.
Engelbert Dollfuss thinks he can LARP as a National Socialist, without even being able to coherently define what a Nation even is. The National Socialist German Worker's Party is just a symbolic thing to point to, a fashion accessory for traditional "Right" wing ZOG politics.
>Our Blood is our Nation
Somehow the "Blood" of our Nation is different than English-speaking European "Canadians," but is simultaneously the same as ancient Greeks, Romans and Kikes.
>Well yes and no.
"Yes, no, maybe, I don't know." He can't answer the question because he has defined Nation to be meaningless nonsense, something he is quite aware of, but hopes the reader is unable to understand.
>Biologically they are very much of the same blood but some modest differences have developed.
"Modest differences" exist between parents and children as well. Do they belong to different Nations? "Modest difference" is a phrase, meant to turn the concept of a Nation into something Engelbert Dollfuss to mold and shape into whatever he wants. So you belong to the same "Blood Nation" as ancient Greeks, Romans, and Kikes, but somehow belong to a different Nation than English-speaking Europeans in "Canada," Australia, etc.
>Language & cultural variations most obviously.
Engelbert Dollfuss apparently thinks "Canadians" speak a language that isn't English! And apparently, they also don't consume the same Hollywood "cultural" products as their "American" counterparts.
>This divergence isn’t so great as to form a completely separate Blood Nation
So now Engelbert Dollfuss contradicts himself completely, and introduces new idiotic phrases to hide it. Apparently We are all the same "Blood Nation." But a "Blood Nation" and a Nation are two different things entirely! So "Canadians" and "Americans" are the same "Blood Nation," but belong to two different Nations! Somehow.
>But it is a distinction.
A "distinction" Engelbert Dollfuss pulled out of his ass, that signifies nothing, except his desire to believe "America" is a Nation!
>This is quite simple and easily grasped by National Socialists.
In fact, the entire experience of the National Socialist German Worker's Party says otherwise. This is why Engelbert Dollfuss will spew this self-conscious tripe about "America" and "Canada," but won't talk about "Austria" and Germany!
>gommunist
Engelbert Dollfuss (the real one, not just his spiritual heir here) also thought screeching "communism" would save him and his "AustroFascist" regime in the end. It didn't.
The ZOG-faggots will screech "communism" all the way to their deaths. This was predicted long ago by William Luther Pierce in the Turner Diaries, and played out historically by Germany and "Austria" over 80 years ago.
The only question the reader should ask is, why do people like Engelbert Dollfuss do this? Because they want people to think Ashkenazi (Euro) Kikes are part of their "Blood Nation" as well. When you define Nation out of existence, and replace it with 'race,' that's what you get. Protecting Ashkenazi (Euro) Kikes is protecting your "Blood Nation," because Moses was a white guy. Didn't you watch the Ten Commandments?
Same race + same language = same Nation.
Same race + different language = different Nation.
Different race + same language = different Nation.
Different race + different language = different Nation.
>>7617
Its like you cant tell how retarded you are?
Y U SOE SAL TEE?
>>7619
>i love kikes and niggers
We know you do, ZOG-faggot.
>>7620
Gommunizm will whine!
>be gommiefag
>find small /pol/ splinter
>'These anons are Nationalists or something, right?'
>NowIsMyChanceToShine.jpg
>Make bread to lure newfags into Stalinist rimjobs
>'Stan was just a nationalist who hated faggots!'
>Be completely unable to explain or elaborate in any way when asked repeatedly.
>Screech ZOG because 'idk, jews or something?'
>bread is a fail
>an hero
mfw.

On the plus side you did answer this question, albeit inadvertently:
Opposing degeneracy such as you indicate was hardly unusual for those times. WHY does stalin oppose them? Is it for generic reasons or is there something specific to gommunizm or stanizm that is more specifically opposed to it?
>>5326
>there is no "world view" that has any well-developed line on degeneracy.
Thus admitting that stanizm doesn’t inherently oppose buttsex.
I WIN!

But you still haven’t answered my other perfectly reasonable questions . . .
>There is a difference between Stalinist Communism and International GloboHomo (((Marxism)))
Explain the difference, gommrade.
What is the underlying world view of Gommunism?

GIVE US SOME MORE ANSWERS, GOMMERADE
(63.64 KB 600x600 lol.jpeg)
>>7618
>Same race + same language = same Nation.
>Same race + different language = different Nation.
>Different race + same language = different Nation.
>Different race + different language = different Nation.
>>7643
>Amerimutt
This ZOG-faggot is telling you that they don't even believe in the concept of race. Or rather, that they think it is their plaything. Today, they will talk about Kikes as their 'racial' enemy. Tomorrow, they will go somewhere else, and tell people Ashkenazi Kikes are your fellow White Blood Brothers, spearheading the war against darky Arabs, Persians, Turks, etc. "Right" wing ZOG politics absolutely thrives on this sort of petty identity-manipulation, and without it, would be completely limited to Christian Zionism.
>gommiefag
Engelbert Dollfuss here will be screeching "communism" while his family is having their throats slit and he is watching.
This behavior was predicted in the Turner Diaries by William Luther Pierce, and played out historically between the National Socialist German Worker's Party and "Austrofascism."
Make no mistake: people like Engelbert Dollfuss here have built their identity around the ZOG, and are only here to act as (unpaid) informants for the FBI (google Hal Turner for a real world example).
It's been almost 60 years now since Yockey has written, and even then, it was plainly obvious to anyone with a brain how to look at the struggle between the USSR and the ZOG.
The visceral reaction of Engelbert Dollfuss to merely pointing out the fact that the USSR was throwing faggots into mental institutions, while the ZOG media was busying building the faggot identity and normalizing it, shows how much he absolutely loves the ZOG.
There was no serious excuse 60 years ago to get this question wrong, and ''even less' of an excuse today.
But hey, if you job (paid or unpaid), is to get young white people to think that homosexual interracial porno called "America" is great, pretending that "America's" triumph over the USSR was some kind of great victory becomes an ideological necessity. It's one of those things the "Right" wing of the ZOG will never stop lying about, as it is a continued source of ideological confusion, the purpose of which is to steer people back into a full embrace of the ZOG.
>>8046
>why do i get keep getting called out for being a liar
Because you're a liar, ZOG-faggot.
But more importantly, people need to understand the real ideological basis of what Engelbert Dollfuss is saying, and to be able to make appropriate deductions from reality.
Politics as a game played by the "Right" wing of the ZOG is based on nothing but sheer lies. Lying is a way of life for people like Engelbert Dollfuss.
Notice how Engelbert Dollfuss constantly avoids any serious discussion, particularly around anything of substance. One that stuck out to me, as one particular example of just how crudely put together his bullshit is, was this particular exchange. I said:
>Morever, there is no "world view" that has any well-developed line on degeneracy.
I think this is self-evidently true. The ancient world, by and large, opposed faggotry, and by that I mean simply opposed the act, as the homosexual identity as we understand it today simply didn't exist. To engage in such acts today turns you into another species, according to the modern understanding of what a faggot is. In the past, however, it was seen more like a vice. When I say there was no "well-developed" line against it, not even in the Bible (the basis for most religious opposition to faggots today), I mean there is no serious discussion of it found in the Bible. The Sky Kike said it is wrong, so it is. Why? One can only speculate what the ancients would have said about the question, had they been pressed on it. But if you're looking for anything more than a handful of quotes condemning ancient buggery, you won't find anything worthwhile. You have to wait to the modern era before you can find such literary material.
Engelbert Dollfuss then declares:
>And as a matter of fact their is. Its called National Socialism.
But Engelbert Dollfuss here is just trying to score points in his head, and just declares (from nowhere!) that the National Socialist German Worker's Party had a well-developed line on the question. Because "Natural Law," something which has almost nothing whatsoever to do with how the NSDAP justified any of their policies.
So I pointed out, multiple times, the issue of Ernst Röhm being a faggot.
>>8046
(continued)
Yes, it is pretty much indisputable Röhm was a faggot. Röhm was a National Socialist before Hitler was, and as many historians have pointed out, it is likely Hitler rose to the top of the party largely because of Röhm's support, which has fueled all sorts of ridiculous and baseless speculation about Hitler's own sexuality.
Engelbert Dollfuss here simply passes over it in silence. If the National Socialist German Worker's Party had a well-developed line against faggotry, why did they let an open faggot become the head the Sturmabteilung, the Party's paramilitary wing?
A person that was actually serious would at least attempt some sort of response, even if a half-hearted one. I even gave my own defense of the NDSAP: namely, that the Faggot Question hadn't yet become the ideological issue it is today. In this regard, it mirrors the USSR's own anti-faggotry: there are only a few scant pieces of material from the major communist figures to point to in their opposition to it, and in the case of Lenin, is itself coded and hidden within a relatively obscure pamphlet about women.
So in fact, what Engelbert Dollfuss is doing is backhandedly attacking the NDSAP for essentially the same thing; not having any well-developed line against faggotry. One might even go further and point out that fact that there weren't any well-known faggots in high positions in the Soviet government ever, not even during their pre-revolutionary days, but yet everyone knew Röhm was a faggot after the 1932, and there is a great deal of evidence many, many people were aware of it before then, including Hitler. Historically speaking, it would be much easier to make the case National Socialism was more tolerant of faggots than Bolshevism ever was (and some self-professed National Socialist faggots have pointed it out in the past).
But Engelbert Dollfuss just passes over it in silence, unconcerned about any of this stuff, because he not only doesn't care about faggotry at all, but doesn't care about National Socialism either.
(256.63 KB 1000x773 18ikl3.jpg)
>>8109
>Because you're a liar, ZOG-faggot.
Citation needed, gommrade.
>Morever, there is no "world view" that has any well-developed line on degeneracy.
>I think this is self-evidently true.
No.
>from nowhere!
Lol
>Because "Natural Law," something which has almost nothing whatsoever to do with how the NSDAP justified any of their policies.
IKR? Natural Law isnt even mentioned anywhere in Mein kampf or in general National Socialist literature.
O wait:
'Let me explain: Man must not fall into the error of thinking that he was ever meant to become lord & master of Nature. A lopsided education has helped to encourage that
illusion. Man must realise that a fundamental law of necessity reigns throughout the
whole realm of Nature & that his existence is subject to the law of eternal struggle &
strife. He will then feel that there cannot be a separate law for mankind in a universe in which planets & suns follow their orbits, where moons & planets trace their destined paths, where the strong are always the masters of the weak & where the latter must obey or be destroyed. Man must also submit to the eternal principles of this supreme wisdom. He may try to understand them but he can never free himself from their sway.' Mein Kampf.
'Man’s effort to build up something that contradicts the iron logic of Nature brings him into conflict with those principles to which he himself exclusively, owes his own
existence.' Mein Kampf

>>8110
>Ernst Röhm being a faggot
Accusations of every kind of depravity were made my jews and gommies like u from the very beginning of National Socialism against everyone. Hitler knew that if he were to jump at every unfounded accusation he would be doing the gommie jews like U work for them. Thus, Rohm escaped detection until he attempted to stage a coup where his depravity was revealed in his personal effects.
He was then shot.
Simple.

Cry more, gommiefag.
>be gommiefag
>find small /pol/ splinter
>'These anons are Nationalists or something, right?'
>NowIsMyChanceToShine.jpg
>Make bread to lure newfags into Stalinist rimjobs
>'Stan was just a nationalist who hated faggots!'
>Be completely unable to explain or elaborate in any way when asked repeatedly.
>Screech ZOG because 'idk, jews or something?'
>bread is a fail
>an hero
mfw.

On the plus side you did answer this question, albeit inadvertently:
Opposing degeneracy such as you indicate was hardly unusual for those times. WHY does stalin oppose them? Is it for generic reasons or is there something specific to gommunizm or stanizm that is more specifically opposed to it?
>>5326
>there is no "world view" that has any well-developed line on degeneracy.
Thus admitting that stanizm doesn’t inherently oppose buttsex.
I WIN!

But you still haven’t answered my other perfectly reasonable questions . . .
>There is a difference between Stalinist Communism and International GloboHomo (((Marxism)))
Explain the difference, gommrade.
What is the underlying world view of Gommunism?

GIVE US SOME MORE ANSWERS, GOMMERADE
>>8170
>Citation needed
One need only ponder a few seconds on why Engelbert Dollfuss thinks English-speaking European "Americans" and English-speaking European "Canadians" belong to two different Nations, yet he won't say what he actually thinks about German and "Austria," to realize this ZOG-faggot isn't serious in the slightest.
>No.
It's also a Christfag.
>pulls throwaway quote from Mein Kampf
Now tell us why "Natural Law" says Engelish-speaking European "Americans" and English-speaking European "Canadians" belong to two separate Nations, but Germans and "Austrians" belong to the same Nation. Oh wait, you can't, and won't.
>Hitler knew that if he were to jump at every unfounded accusation he would be doing the gommie jews
Röhm admitted to the entire party that yes, he was indeed a faggot in 1932. This Engelbert Dollfuss here would know if he knew any actual history about the party. They didn't do shit about it. Hitler doesn't even mention, or even allude, to him being a faggot in his speech after they killed him. Guess "Natural Law" didn't matter that much, eh?
(131.20 KB 1041x796 Nations.png)
>>8185
> English-speaking European "Americans" and English-speaking European "Canadians" belong to two different Nations, yet he won't say what he actually thinks about German and "Austria,"
You mean pic related? seems pretty clear.
>a Christfag
No.
>Germans and "Austrians" belong to the same Nation
Hasn’t even read Mein Kampf.
Tells a National Socialist what National Socialism is.
Audacious.
>Rohm admitted
Citation needed, gommrade . . .

Gommie gonna cry?

Still waiting for some answers btw.
On the plus side you did answer this question, albeit inadvertently:
Opposing degeneracy such as you indicate was hardly unusual for those times. WHY does stalin oppose them? Is it for generic reasons or is there something specific to gommunizm or stanizm that is more specifically opposed to it?
>>5326
>there is no "world view" that has any well-developed line on degeneracy.
Thus admitting that stanizm doesn’t inherently oppose buttsex.
I WIN!

But you still haven’t answered my other perfectly reasonable questions . . .
>There is a difference between Stalinist Communism and International GloboHomo (((Marxism)))
Explain the difference, gommrade.
What is the underlying world view of Gommunism?

GIVE US SOME MORE ANSWERS, GOMMERADE
>>8185
Btw, still no citation given, gommrade. Sad.
(28.06 KB 433x578 oink oink.jpg)
(1.90 MB 480x360 oink oink.mp4)
>>8185
Greetings leftypol. Oink oink.
(139.91 KB 1789x470 reply1.png)
(238.87 KB 1793x914 reply2.png)
>>8186
>let me post a pic of a post in this thread, as if there was no response to it
Engelbert Dollfuss sure is proud of this rambling bunch of nonsense, isn't he?
>No.
Engelbert Dollfuss also practices Christian Taqiyya.
>please don't make me make a statement about whether Germany and Austria are two different Nations
Notice how Engelbert Dollfuss completely avoids addressing the question of Germany and "Austria" put forward to it literally dozens of times, in this thread alone.
>Citation needed, gommrade . . .
Here you go, Engelbert Dollfuss: Title: Sex and the Weimar Republic: German Homosexual Emancipation and the Rise of the Nazis by Laurie Marhoefer, page 159. Her source is the German edition of the Goebbels Diaries, as there is no English translation of most of his earlier stuff: Goebbels, Tagebücher, 235.
>>8191
Really? A book written by a jew tranny citing a text only available in German from a questionable source used by another gommie to justify sodomy?
Poor effort, gommrade 3/10.
And still no answers . . .
On the plus side you did answer this question, albeit inadvertently:
Opposing degeneracy such as you indicate was hardly unusual for those times. WHY does stalin oppose them? Is it for generic reasons or is there something specific to gommunizm or stanizm that is more specifically opposed to it?
>>5326
>there is no "world view" that has any well-developed line on degeneracy.
Thus admitting that stanizm doesn’t inherently oppose buttsex.
I WIN!

But you still haven’t answered my other perfectly reasonable questions . . .
>There is a difference between Stalinist Communism and International GloboHomo (((Marxism)))
Explain the difference, gommrade.
What is the underlying world view of Gommunism?

GIVE US SOME MORE ANSWERS, GOMMERADE
>>8191
>>8195
Didn’t provide the quote either.
>>8195
>Really? A book written by a jew tranny
Who else would you expect to be so interested in faggots in Germany?
>citing a text only available in German from a questionable source used by another gommie to justify sodomy?
I think Engelbert Dollfuss must have finally lost his mind, as nothing after the word "German" makes any sense whatsoever. Is he saying Goebbels is a "questionable source" that was used by someone (who?) to justify faggotry (where?)?
>>8197
>Didn’t provide the quote either.
If you're interested in tracking it down yourself, the full reference is "Goebbels, Joseph. Die Tagebücher von Joseph Goebbels. Edited by Elke
Fröhlich. Munich: K.G. Saur, 2004." I was unable to locate any electronic source for this that wasn't behind a paywall.
>>8206
The quote from the book, gommrade.
You must provide it it its just you’re word.
That's how citations work . . .
>come to neinchan
>good threads exist
>a thread on commies exists
>the commie thread has 100 replies

What the fuck are you doing /pol/? Ignore this communist filth and post worthwhile things!
>>8208
But its funny.
>>8207
>The quote from the book
Here's a screenshot for you, since you're too lazy to go look for yourself (the book is available online for free, at the usual places).
>>8212
Congratulation, you just proved that National Socialism opposes sodomites. Thanks.
>>8215
>Congratulation, you just proved that National Socialism opposes sodomites. Thanks.
No one (in this thread, anyway) said they didn't. Even the author of the book I just cited goes into some detail regarding how this myth was spread.
>>8215
Then what was the point of the post, gommrade?
>>8215
>Congratulation, you just proved that National Socialism opposes sodomites. Thanks.
Upon first reading this sentence, I read this as "the National Socialists (of Germany), not "National Socialism."
Engelbert Dollfuss here doesn't look at the National Socialist Germany Worker's Party as a model for our Nation to possible follow and learn from. To him, it is merely some sort of replacement religion for Christianity. "National Socialism" is something that should be identical in every Nation, like religion (and yes, communism as generally practiced by "Americans"). Again, it is a fashion accessory to an already pre-existing set of ZOG-politics he acquired a long time before. Engelbert Dollfuss isn't interested in the "National" part of "National Socialism" (nor the socialism part, for that matter). This is why he avoids drawing any clear conclusions from the German experience with that thing called "Austria."
"Sodomites" is another give-away as well, and is something only a religious retard would use as a way to refer to faggots.
This is also why Engelbert Dollfuss demanded proof the party knew Röhm was a faggot for years. Hitler's attitude was lax on the question, but the mind of the modern Christfaggot has turned it into quite the ideological turning point. This is why he is concerned with whether or not some disembodied abstraction like National Socialism 'opposes' (notice the present tense) faggotry, and not with the National Socialist German Worker's Party opposed faggotry.
>>8220>>8220
>"National Socialism" is something that should be identical in every Nation,
No. Only the fundamental principles: Natural Law - Nation - Honour as explained in the NSG thread.
The specific of National socialism are expressed through the national character of the Nation itself. Its racial soul if you like. The whole point is that the National Socialist state enables the Nation to express itself organically.
>christcuck
Still not a christian, gommrade. The rest is just dialectic pilpul.
Fyi its present tense because i AM a National Socialist

So you acknowledge National Socialism opposes sodomites and even provide some superficial evidence of this.
Yet you refuse to recognise the philosophical basis for this because you dun goofed when you revealed the following:

On the plus side you did answer this question, albeit inadvertently:
Opposing degeneracy such as you indicate was hardly unusual for those times. WHY does stalin oppose them? Is it for generic reasons or is there something specific to gommunizm or stanizm that is more specifically opposed to it?
>>5326
>there is no "world view" that has any well-developed line on degeneracy.
Thus admitting that stanizm doesn’t inherently oppose buttsex.
You prove that your shitty memes are nothing but shallow propaganda without any underlying worldview for backup and you’re entire bread is a fail.
I WIN!

And you absolutely refuse to answer the following questions for some reason. Even though your entire point was to spread gommunizm. Odd.

>There is a difference between Stalinist Communism and International GloboHomo (((Marxism)))
Explain the difference, gommrade.
What is the underlying world view of Gommunism?

GIVE US SOME MORE ANSWERS, GOMMERADE
>>8217
meant 4 u >>8216
>>8220
salty
(81.35 KB 960x617 1s.jpg)
So lets recap for the anons who amazingly haven’t bothered to read this retarded gommie bread.
Gommrade buttplug, being a marxist degenerate decided to infiltrate and subvert by pretending that his uncle stan was
>just a nationalist who hated fags and not really a maxist, honest!
Here:
>>4508
>There is a difference between Stalinist Communism and International GloboHomo (((Marxism)))
And here:
>>5314
>For the vast, vast majority of people that ever called themselves a communist, it was Nationalism, pure and simple
When asked to elaborate here:
>>4509
and repeatedly ITT he was completely unwilling and unable to do so and attempted to deflect with the groundless use of buzzwords like zog, christcuck, niggerlover etc...
When called out further the marxist filth inadvertently revealed how full of bullshit he is here:
>>5326
>there is no "world view" that has any well-developed line on degeneracy.
Thus admitting that he has no specific opposition to degenerates and revealing his shit memes as the shallow manipulation and lies that they are.
(613.46 KB 1920x1200 2s.jpg)
The marxist filth then attempted to pilpul with
>>5216
>The USSR also didn't force integration with niggers on the White Nation.
and here:
>>5313
>Not too many different colors in Stalin's Russia. One certainly dominated.
>>5350
>The ZOG told the masses of the White Nation that "communism" meant forced integration with niggers.
Trying to imply that his uncle stan was a racial Nationalist.
The fucking retard also attempted to imply that White nationalists and particularly National Socialists were somehow supportive of communism:
>>5548
>Pierce made many remarks about the USSR, but he didn't write a book about White Nationalists attacking the USSR. He made one about them attacking the ZOG, retard.
And while samefagging:
>>5318
>Spot on. It's not a coincidence that the most dead serious White Nationalists -- guys like Yockey, Carto, Pierce -- all clued in on that.
>>5328
>If you actually read Siege, Mason makes several remarks about "communism" that shows his thinking was more in line with Yockey than Rockwell.
>>7618
>The ZOG-faggots will screech "communism" all the way to their deaths. This was predicted long ago by William Luther Pierce in the Turner Diaries, and played out historically by Germany and "Austria" over 80 years ago.
(2.09 MB 3200x2400 3s.jpg)
When called out as a cultural marxist he denied it even existed, further trying to pilpul by switching the name cultural marxism with the phenomena itself, here:
>>5216
>"Cultural Marxism" is a term invented by a ZOG-loving faggot
>>5548
>We know you hate the term ZOG. It's too concise, too accurate, leaving no wiggle room for Kikes and their servants to escape. Quite unlike "Cultural Marxism," in fact.
Completely ignoring the Frankfurt school and its visible effects like they never even existed, lol.
He then attempted to claim that National Socialism was not opposed to degeneracy by using the sodomite Ernst Rohm as 'proof' of our tolerance, lol.
>>8110
> If the National Socialist German Worker's Party had a well-developed line against faggotry, why did they let an open faggot become the head the Sturmabteilung, the Party's paramilitary wing?
And:
>>5334
>The National Socialist German Worker's Party didn't have any well-developed thesis on faggots >either, and had many open faggots in its ranks (Rohm),
And:
>>8110
>Historically speaking, it would be much easier to make the case National Socialism was more >tolerant of faggots than Bolshevism ever was (and some self-professed National Socialist faggots >have pointed it out in the past).
When asked for citation the fuckwhit posted this gem:
>>8212
>Pic related
In a hilarious self own that only demonstrating that they wanted to kill the pervert and would but for the political fallout at the time and the intercession of Hitler who decided to give Rohm the benefit of the doubt, showing laxity on the Fuhrers part but no more than that.
The marxist turd then goes on to acknowledge National Socialisms opposition to degenerates here:
>>8216
>>Congratulation, you just proved that National Socialism opposes sodomites. Thanks.
>No one (in this thread, anyway) said they didn't. Even the author of the book I just cited goes into >some detail regarding how this myth was spread.
Directly contradicting and rendering his earlier claims void and further demonstrating his astonishing fuckwhittery.
(2.59 MB 1920x1080 5s.png)
Unable to make any headway the retarded marxist (but i repeat myself) tries to inform a National Socialist what National Socialism is, despite quite obviously never having read a single page of even Mein Kampf.
Denying Natural Law as one of our fundamentals for instance:
>>8109
>Because "Natural Law," something which has almost nothing whatsoever to do with how the NSDAP justified any of their policies.
And pontificating on what a Nation is:
>>7618
>Same race + same language = same Nation.
>Same race + different language = different Nation.
>Different race + same language = different Nation.
>Different race + different language = different Nation.
>>7617
>Engelbert Dollfuss here is telling you Nations aren't real. "A thing of Blood" is a phrase used to >substitute race for Nation, because all ZOG-faggots think Ashkenazi (Euro) Kikes in Israel are part >of their "Blood Nation." The ZOG-faggot doesn't identify with his real Nation, but with some >imaginary thing called "Western Civilization," beginning with Kike mythological history. Just like >the ZOG taught them to do in those things they call schools.
>>5335
>If you don't speak German, you aren't part of the German Nation, period.
>>5349
>>But what about genetic clusters within the white meta race, gommrade?
>This is the ZOG-faggot mocking the common understanding the masses of the White Nation have. >The ZOG-faggot is admitting they don't believe in the existence of Nations, while trying to locate >being anything at all is associated with a set of alleles. They also think faggots are like this.
>>7618
>Because they want people to think Ashkenazi (Euro) Kikes are part of their "Blood Nation" as >well. When you define Nation out of existence, and replace it with 'race,'
>>7618
>Engelbert Dollfuss thinks he can LARP as a National Socialist, without even being able to >coherently define what a Nation even is. The National Socialist German Worker's Party is just a >symbolic thing to point to, a fashion accessory for traditional "Right" wing ZOG politics.
In spite of it being spelled out quite simply, here: >>5667
Before finally collapsing in a pile of his own shit and crying himself to sleep here:
>>8220
Sadly, this only touches on gommrade buttplugs complete retardation. He was most likely an iron march lurker that only picked up on the most autistic parts and decided to parrot them to blend in.
So what was the point of all this besides the stupefying exhibit of seeing a marxist try to fit his cock and balls up his own anus?
Education. For newfags unfamiliar with how the commienigger operate it should be quite eye opening. They behave almost exactly like jews do when they bicker with each other in the fucking talmud, try to play the victim or attempt to sell you something. They begin with lies & dissembling and just pilpul from there. The concept of fundamental truth is beyond them and ITT it really shows. Marxists of all kinda are spiritual jews and every single one of them must die.

Im quite sure that gommrade buttplug will continue to bicker and strawman because gommunizm will whine as always. But since i was the only one bothering to reply to his gibberish that should fizzle out pretty quickly.

Remember, gommrade, just like gommunizm this time your suicide attempt will work!

/thread.

Delete
Report/Ban

Captcha (required for reports and bans by board staff)


no cookies?